Loading summary
A
Support for this podcast and the following message come from National Geographic's new series, out of Time with Tom Hiddleston premieres Wednesday, July 22nd at 8, 7 Central on National Geographic and streaming next day on Disney and Hulu.
B
This is FRESH air. I'm Tonya Moseley. Something strange is happening to the human face. Plastic surgery in the US Is increasingly designed to be invisible and and it's working. Faces are being lifted, filled and reshaped to look naturally youthful and at the same time, unnatural. My guest today, writer Gia Tolentino, says this new era of cosmetic enhancement is quietly changing the way people think about aging and what we believe a real face should look like. In her latest New Yorker piece, our Plastic Surgery Nightmare, Tolentino reports that cosmetic procedures like Botox and fillers once associated with middle age are now becoming popular for teenagers, with plastic surgeons reporting a significant uptick of patients under 30. Some are even posting photos online asking strangers whether a facelift is their only hope. One influencer got famous by striking his jawline with a hammer as part of the online movement known as Looks Maxing. Other young men followed suit. And artificial intelligence trained on millions of these new faces is generating new beauty standards. Tolentino argues that what's changing isn't just our appearance, it's our relationship to reality. Her argument is that when every face can be optimized, filtered or surgically refined, the face itself begins to lose its status as evidence of a life lived. She argues that the thing we've long treated as a window into another person is becoming less human and more like a product. Gia Tolentino is a staff writer at the New Yorker and the bestselling author of the essay collection Trick Mirror. Seven years ago, she coined the phrase Instagram face, capturing the beauty ideal of the social media era. Her new essay asks what that face has become and Gia Tolentino, welcome back to FRESH air.
C
Thank you so much for having me.
B
Okay. As I mentioned to you, this piece has hit a nerve. And so much of the reaction is basically, yes, we are seeing this, we are feeling this. What can we actually do about it? And the same thing actually happened seven years ago when you coined this term Instagram face. And so I thought before we actually get into your latest piece, remind us what Instagram face is or was, right?
C
So sometime last decade, if you were on Instagram, you probably noticed that most of the most prominent, most highly visible faces who generally all belong to white female influencers, they started to kind of converge on a singular face. I remember someone I A makeup artist described it as a sexy baby tiger. You know, it was the kind of Kim Kardashian looks like, Kendall Jenner looks like Bella Hadid looks like Emily Ratajkowski. There was this kind of convergence of the face towards a certain mean that seemed to me to be very overtly shaped by the algorithm. The face looked like the beauty filters that Snapchat and Instagram provided to kind of lift your cheeks and plump your lips and make your eyes bigger and make your chin a little more heart shaped. And you could press a button or you could use facetune to digitally alter your face to fit this kind of algorithmically approved beauty standard. Like, this was a face that the algorithm liked. If your face looked like this, you would get more views on your pictures. And then concurrently, this, there were these technologies. This was kind of the rise of injectables, Botox, filler, these little tweaks that you could do in real life to match the tweaks that you could do digitally. And I wanted to write about it then because it just seemed interesting that faces were becoming the same, that these highly visible faces were becoming the same. And the incentives didn't necessarily seem to be coming from within, they seemed to be coming from without. And I wondered, what is gonna happen in the future? And now we're kind of living right.
B
So for those who aren't maybe online enough to really pick up the changes over the last seven years, paint a picture for us, what is coming out of this new era on our screens. Not just on our screens too, but also in real life, what are we actually seeing? What does this new aesthetic actually look like?
C
So this began as kind of niche behavior among the professionally beautiful, the wealthy and famous. But the desire trickles down because those faces are necessarily visually overrepresented. And what those women do trickles down into the desire for the general population. And in the nearly, let's say, decade that has elapsed, when I was starting to research this piece, I started just Googling cities in the United States. I started Googling mid sized cities everywhere outside the coasts to check, you know, how widespread is this behavior? Actually, there are some proxies, like the Reddit for R plasticsurgery. It has almost as many weekly visitors as the Reddit forum for R running. So there are some proxies where you can tell this is becoming a quite generalized interest. If you are on social media, you see the way that people's faces have become uncanny. The foreheads are freezing, the lips are plump. Instagram face has kind of trickled down to the general population. You can get it at your local strip mall basically anywhere you are in the US and people certainly do. And now the faces of the rich and famous and professionally beautiful, now it's changing. Now there's facelifts. Now there's these invisible facelifts. There are the flickers of desire in the general population. People being like, well, should I get a facelift at age 30? This seems to be the next wave of what's happening, that the facelifts are becoming the kind of soon to be normalized desire.
B
Yeah. And the facelifts themselves are providing a look that maybe is taking us in another direction of trying to look more natural. You mentioned some of those more popular Reddit pages. There are also so many plastic surgeons now who have these accounts that are very popular showing before and afters of these deep plane facelifts, which aren't for the faint of heart.
C
Yeah. Well, something I found.
B
You write about this.
C
Yeah, yeah, I find it. You know, it just. It's interesting, right? The Instagram face. The procedures themselves were kind of fundamentally nonviolent. A little needle there, back to the office. Right. But people kind of looked obviously altered. If you think about. I mean, the Kardashians are the easiest proxy for this. You could see their faces changing in real time. Kim Kardashian published a selfie book called Selfish where you could see how her face had changed. It was. The work was on display, even though the procedures themselves were fairly minor. The facelift is interesting because the procedure itself is kind of extraordinarily violent. You're severing all these layers of muscle and fat and fascia. Bridget Reed did a piece for New York Magazine where she describes a plastic surgeon lifting the face off of its bones like a Halloween mask and rearranging it. But the results are almost supernatural, almost something mystical and gnostic about it, where there's this. They kind of imply this complex secret knowledge. And as you mentioned, there's kind of a cottage industry that has been growing over the last decade because these things are interesting to look at on screens. We love looking at faces, and we love looking at faces because, as I was writing, you know, the face is traditionally how we come to know each other. How we. The first glimpse we have of a person's temperament and soul and life history
B
and disposition, it tells us. It answers so many questions. Also, you can tell if a person is tired. You can tell if they're sick. You can tell their emotions. Do they laugh a lot by their laugh lines? It's A marker of allowing us to see if we can even trust a person. I mean, you're basically arguing that we're entering a world where these faces communicate. Because Botox and some of these other treatments freeze the face, we're losing the ability to read one another.
C
Yeah, absolutely. I mean, it seems like, you know, like you were saying, there are plastic surgeons on Instagram and TikTok. They're all of these influencers that are just for kind of forensically analyzing what people may and may not have done. We love to look at faces. We're still looking at faces, but increasingly online, especially if you are a girl or you're a woman, your feed is likely tailored towards these sort of things. The face is being presented to us as a consumer guide and a disciplinary manual rather than a human repository of disposition and life. And, you know, I don't think this in and of itself, I don't think individually there's anything immoral or wrong about plasticity, about changing your looks. You know, individually these cases are not very interesting and not worth, you know, judging on an individual level whatsoever. But it just does seem collectively like that shift has happened, that the face is not something that, especially if you are socialized as a woman, that you're looking at for human information that you want human information and experience to show on your face. It's really being reconfigured as kind of a, an object that should stand up under digital surveillance.
B
Aside from the hundred thousand dollars facelifts, what are those who are not in the top brackets doing?
C
It's a lot of injectables. You know, I think there's kind of the non surgical facelift that a lot of people. That's certainly quite popular in the suburbs of Houston, where I grew up, where it's like just well placed Botox and filler to shape. You know, you can put it in your jawline to thin your cheeks. You know, you can kind of lift your brow with Botox, you can kind of plump and reshape your face. People are getting eye lifts, you know, they're getting blepharoplasties on their upper and lower lids. There's kind of threads you can get in your forehead to lift. There's neck lifts, there's mini lipo, there's all sorts of stuff. There's the realm of just constant facial resurfacing with laser and, you know, and all of these things. You know, again, it's like individually, whatever, right? You know, individually let people live. However, collectively it just. What is this reframing the face as
B
it's not just our faces either. Our producer Molly points out that BBL's Brazilian butt lifts are being reversed and people are taking off their nails and lashes are going out of style. It's kind of turning into the clean girl aesthetic. Is that sort of under the same phenomenon?
C
One thing that is just kind of blanket true, will always be true about beauty standards for women is that they're never static. There's never a final point. Well, at least from the point of view of the industries dictating it, which now include the surveillance technologies of the phone and social media, there is never a fixed point at which contentment is prescribed or incentivized or, you know, or okayed. It's what is prescribed is just a perpetual work, a perpetual outlay of money and time. And most importantly concern a sense of the self as something that must always be optimized, perfected, improved. And you know, this is beauty standards have been punitive, disciplinary. They have served the interests of those in power for basically all of human history and every human culture. But there's something interesting about it right now in that it seems more explicitly anti human right now than ever before. There seem to be something that's dovetailing with the age of AI. And AI is where the consequences of Instagram face, they are already quite clear, right? The fact that so many of the most visible women on the Internet kind of resemble each other, have this look that if you're on Instagram, you can probably close your eyes and summon, you know, the fact that that is kind of what a woman on the Internet looks like to the data scraping engines that are powering AI. You know, the Washington Post did this great investigation a couple of years ago. They asked AI, you know, AI image generators, multiple of them, to produce an image of a normal woman. Almost every face that was generated was white, young and beautiful. Right. You know, there's already been such a distinct effect. And one wonders, AI is something that I personally, you know, take issue with for the way that it kind of programmatically positions what is specifically human as inferior for being specifically human, for being bounded, for being imperfect, when in fact our boundedness, our imperfection, our kind of imminence, that's the best thing about us. That's what makes us actually human. And so the way that all of this is manifesting through the face is really what I wanted to write about.
B
I find it interesting, I want to go back a little bit to your Instagram face. Some of the things that you found about how these faces are very racialized, but in a way that sort of combines all of these different attributes of every race to make this prototype, this face, by which AI then uses it to build an AI generated woman. This woman is white. But remind us what you found back then and what happened to that racial dimension now that we have entered this era of invisible surgery.
C
Yeah, I remember there was something about Instagram face. It was sort of this, what I found to be kind of a rootless exoticism, but it was always on. Almost always on a white woman, or it was always most profitable and most visible on a white woman. And there was a way where the face had kind of captured signifiers of other ethnicities, of kind of borrowed this sense of, you know, of something other, while always kind of resoundingly serving whiteness itself. But I talked to a celebrity makeup artist who described it. He said, you know, there's a South Asian influence with the brows and eye shape, an African American influence with the lip, a Caucasian nose, a cheek structure that's predominantly Native American and Middle Eastern. And that, you know, 10 years later has resulted. When you ask AI to generate an image, let's say, of a beautiful woman, they are almost exclusively. Yeah, white, thin, young, but they have those features. And so there's this erasure of other forms of faces, certainly other forms of beauty. Near total erasure based on what the AI just scraping Instagram, scraping faces, scraping the kind of racial hierarchies and preferences that are built into every system in our country. It's now AI thinks and will tell people, this is what a normal woman is. This is what a beautiful woman is.
B
Okay, I've got to tell you something that happened to me. So I downloaded one of those apps that makes your photos look like they were shot on a 90s point and shoot. And so when I ran one of my pictures through it, though, it didn't give me the flash effect that I wanted. It handed me back. I'm black, so it handed me back myself as a white woman with a thinner nose and lighter skin. And what you're describing is why this happens. So AI has been trained on all of these Instagram faces, and. But this is scary because, I mean, people are doing this to such a degree. What are you finding about maybe, like, you know, dysmorphia on what someone's face actually looks like? What is that doing to us when we're continually doing this and then people are posting these things out into the world? I mean, some people are actually blind to it. I was horrified by it. Also kind of disappointed cause I paid some money for this app, you know,
C
you should sue them. No, that's horrible. I mean that's horrible. And imagine if you were 16, right? It's crushing to think about. And you know, to be a teenage girl is a nightmare as it is. You know, we have no end of studies about how any time on visual social media is profoundly destructive to the mental health and confidence and kind of sense of autonomy in young girls and teenagers and young women. But yeah, you see it everywhere. There was, There was a 12 year old that went viral on TikTok for her anti aging skin routine. If you look on non visual forms of social media, you know, like on Reddit, you'll, or on Twitter, on any, any place, you'll find teenagers wondering, you know, should I start getting Botox? I'm 18, like I'm starting to see signs of aging. You will have 20 somethings wondering if they should get a facelift because they think they have jowls. I'm in my late 30s and I was Googling, you know, I'm 37, should I get a facelift? Just trying to see what one would see if one were to google this. And you know, I tried it on my husband's phone, I tried it on my, you know, I tried it on incognito. And all of the first search results say, you know, probably not a full one, but a mini one could be good. And the most naysaying opinion I could find was someone saying no, just do Botox instead. Just do Botox and injectables instead. Don't get a, you know, don't get a full, just mini or Botox. Because basically if you are a young woman and you are interfacing with the Internet, there is essentially no system that will tell you your face as good as it is. And there's no end to the systems that will say improve it, perfect it. And there's something interesting happening where young people are getting Botox in their 20s. Like there was a recent statistic, there was a 75% increase from 2019 to 2022 in people under the age of 20 getting Botox and filler. I think there were something like 50,000 injectable procedures performed in 2024 on people age 20 or younger. You know, these are not massive numbers, but that's, you know, it's pretty wild to think about, right?
B
Because this is interesting that you try to search on other people's phones, including your husband's phone, because I guess you assume that because he's a male he's part of a different algorithm and it might have a different output for you. So you're basically saying if you're on online, there's kind of no way to get around it.
C
Yeah. There is nothing online right now that is telling people that what is human is good specifically for being human. Right. It's just the drive towards optimization that has, you know, that has encompassed and driven, like every tech industry all of Silicon Valley for the past 20 years. It's really it's come to roost in our faces and bodies and souls. Like, I mean, it feels like it feels like what is happening. I mean, the feeling that I had that made me start writing this, it was I was just like, the face is kind of separating from the person and the person is separating from the soul. And this is being systemically encouraged by kind of any single thing you'll find on the Internet.
B
Our guest today is New Yorker staff writer Gia Tolentino. We'll be right back after a short break. I'm Tonya Mosley, and this is FRESH air.
C
This message comes from NPR sponsor Carvana. Carvana makes car buying easy 100% online
B
prices down to the penny delivered to your door.
C
Why make car buying hard when it could be easy?
B
Visit Carvana.com today.
C
Terms may apply.
A
This message comes from Jerry. Many people are overpaying on car insurance. Why? Switching providers can be a pain. Jerry helps make the process painless. Jerry is the only app that compares rates from over 50 insurers in minutes and helps you switch fast with no spam calls or hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jeri could save over $1,300 a year before you renew your car insurance policy. Download the Jeri app or head to Jeri AI npr.
C
The midterms are coming, and if you think the news cycle feels intense now, just wait until the fall. That's why summer is a perfect time to make sure your news diet is calibrate. Martinez on up first, we unpack the three biggest stories every morning so you can stay informed and get on with your day in fewer than 15 minutes. Follow or subscribe to Up FIRST today wherever you get. Podcasts, big news stories don't always break
B
on your schedule, but with the NPR
C
app, news, culture and podcasts are ready
B
when you want them in your pocket. Download the NPR app today. This is FRESH air. I'm Tonya Moseley, and my guest today is Gia Tolentino, staff writer at the New Yorker. Seven years ago, she coined the term Instagram face, capturing the beauty ideal of the Social media era. Her latest piece, Our Plastic Surgery Nightmare, argues that we've entered a new age of cosmetic enhancement, one designed to be invisible, with facelifts that leave no trace. Teenagers asking strangers online if surgery is their only hope, an artificial intelligence generation, flawless faces that are resetting the beauty standard. Tolentino says what's changing isn't just how we look. It's our relationship to reality itself. She is also the author of the best selling essay collection Trick Mirror. One of the paradoxes at the center of this essay is also that plastic surgery is becoming both detectable and more extreme at the same time. And the Mar a Lago face in particular is a good example of this. Can you describe, describe it for us?
C
I feel kind of a fondness for what's called Mar a Lago face because, yeah, because it's almost like, it's almost quaint, you know. So Mar a Lago face is. If you have observed the faces of the women of the second Trump administration, this is Mar a Lago face. It's kind of like Instagram face. It's as if kind of the Kardashian esque Beauty Standard of 2016 has ported itself 10 years later to the seat of American power and added quite a lot of makeup to it. Like, it's, it's this, it's what plastic surgery used to be, where it flaunts itself, where it, where it kind of flaunts its lack of relationship to human reality, which I, which I find kind of funny and I find almost quaint. And it also, you know, there's a way in which it mirrors the actual political policy as of the Trump administration, where power is displayed in, you know, proudly disconnecting from reality altogether. And in that line that these Botox
B
and filler faces and the approach to governing are basically the same gesture.
C
It's saying that what is given, what is human doesn't matter. I'm gonna slash it to bits and, you know, put some gold and lipstick on it and we're gonna, you know, it's the equivalent of the Trump ballroom, basically, in human face form. And, you know, there's also something. It's quite. It's so aggressively female. You know, it's. There's something. This is certainly not a new observation, but it's very interesting to watch, you know, people that are very much against trans healthcare, gender affirming, you know, medical care display a beauty look that is nothing if not gender affirming. It's fundamentally gender affirming. Surgery, like much plastic surgery, is so
B
for, like A mar. A lago woman, she's performing maximal femininity. And for the men, which we're gonna get into, this looks maxing. They're kind of surgically building maximal maleness totally. Which is drag.
C
I mean, it's literally, it's drag. Which is why it's always been so funny to me to see Republicans be so against drag and children's exposure to drag and against again, like trans affirming, gender affirming medical care, because essentially all plastic surgery, you know, the hair transplants that men are getting in Turkey, you know, the breast implants and nose jobs of, you know, a more, a more innocent time of the 80s and 90s when those were the only things that, you know, that people maybe got that's it's gender affirming surgery.
B
So there is a version of this playing out with the tradwife trend. These influencers who have lots of followers, sometimes millions of followers, they're kind of performing a femininity in another way too. With their kitchen standing in their kitchens and in these prairie dresses, they're being domestic, they're performing submission. It's femininity content in a way. And how does this kind of fit into what you're describing, this world of face altering?
C
Well, I think that there is the tradwife thing, you know, there are some very kind of obvious built in contradictions and paradoxes in it, right. Where the women that are most famous as tradwives, they are not trad wives, they are million dollar business people. Right. They are entrepreneurs, they make more money than their husbands. You know, they're, you know, they're heads of enormous businesses. And, you know, there's a similar kind of contradiction with the kind of mar a lago face territory where let's say, you know, the administration, its point of view on public health is, you know, it's funny to have the beauty look of the second Trump administration be so overtly artificial, one that is only possible with injecting, you know, synthetic substances into your face. And at the same time they're saying raw milk only, you know, the milk vaccine schedule. Yeah, like there's, there's a, there's a similar built in contradiction between the, you know, the aggressively prescribed naturalness quote unquote, and then what the faces look like and what actually has to go into the faces for them to look like that.
B
Let's take a short break. If you're just joining us, my guest is Gia Toletino, staff writer at the New Yorker. Her latest piece is called Our Plastic Surgery Nightmare. It's about the new era of undetectable cosmetic surgery and what it's doing to our sense of what's real. We'll continue our conversation after a short break. This is FRESH air.
C
This message comes from NPR sponsor Carvana. Carvana makes car buying easy 100% online
B
prices down to the penny, delivered to your door.
C
Why make car buying hard when it could be easy?
B
Visit Carvana.com today.
C
Terms may apply.
A
This message comes from Jerry. Many people are overpaying on car insurance. Why? Switching providers can be a pain. Jerry helps make the process painless. Jerry is the only app that compares rates from over 50 insurers in minutes and helps you switch fast with no spam calls or hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year before you renew your car insurance policy, download the Jerry app or head to Jerry. AI npr.
C
One year ago, Congress eliminated over a billion dollars in funding for public media. Yet we the people haven't back. When you donate to the independent nonprofits that make up the NPR network, we hold the powerful to account together. It's the kind of journalism democracy requires
B
that we, the public, must protect.
C
Join the community of people who power this work@plus.NPR.org
B
this is FRESH AIR. And today I'm talking with Gia Tolentino of the New Yorker. Her latest piece is about the new era of invisible plastic surgery, from six figure facelifts to AI generated faces and why she says it's eroding our connection to reality. We have been more or less talking about women, but I wanna bring men into this conversation because some of the strangest reporting in this piece is about young men. There is a 20 year old influencer who got famous for, among other things, hitting his own jaw with a hammer to look hotter. And what's interesting is I brought this up to my kids and they were like, oh, yeah, they knew his name, right? So for listeners who have never heard the word looksmaxing and this guy, tell us about both what is looksmaxing and who is this guy?
C
Well, if you'll permit me to again, rewind a little bit to last decade. So looksmaxing is a fundamentally reactionary anti feminist ideology that came out of something these larger political and discursive changes that happened on the Internet last decade. Right. So if we can if we can, you know, travel our minds through time to, you know, an era where Obama was president and, you know, there were women's magazines and there were feminist websites and Twitter still seemed like a kind of democratizing medium Rather than whatever it is now. And so there were all of these social changes where young women, you know, feminism was ascendant. It was kind of culturally dominant. There was an annoying strain of it that, you know, I'm sure you remember there were kind of T shirts that were like, lord, grant me the confidence of a mediocre white man. You know, there were mugs that said male tears. And, you know, this came with, I think, a pretty flippant version of beauty. This also came with the sort of Dove real beauty, where it was like it was positioned as an issue of feminist importance to make sure all women were beautiful. And I remember being in my 20s and thinking, no, no, no, no, no, no. We should say that beauty matters less, not more.
B
Say more about that. Because that was the time period when, yes, the Dove commercials were really big. There was sort of the burgeoning body positivity movement.
C
Yeah. And, you know, the body positivity movement. It's. You know, there's. It was wonderful and it carried these negative consequences. Right. Like, it was incredibly meaningful in that the body positivity movement was trying to say. And also to commercialize the idea that any kind of body is gorgeous and any, you know, all bodies, all skin tones, all levels of physical ability, that there's beauty in every human, which is something that I believe, but underneath it, there was. There was a need to prove that, to render that ideology kind of workable culturally. What had to be attached was that these bodies can be kind of commercially declared beautiful. And that, to me, is where the danger crept in. It was like, we're gonna have to successfully commodify every different kind of body to prove that all bodies are beautiful. And I remember being. I worked for the website Jezebel at the time, and I remember feeling like this was a little bit of a trap, like that we were making it politically important to designate everyone as beautiful, like in an ad campaign or something, where I actually think the trap for women to begin with is the idea that everyone needs to be beautiful.
B
So. Right. So looks maxing comes from these men's groups on the Internet. And they were organized around this conviction that basically women don't have or don't deserve equal rights. And this guy in particular that hid his. Hit his face with the jaw. I mean, where does he. Who is he? And where does he come in in all of this?
C
So we're talking about Clavicular, who is a 20 year old influencer who's gotten very famous for, you know, having done micro doses of meth since he was a teenager to lose weight and on these peptides and hitting his jaw with a hammer to, you know, become more beautiful. But again, yes, he's part of a community called Looksmaxers, which all came up in reaction to the chatter of feminism that was happening last Dec. Women asserting themselves as people they're reacting to MeToo, to women saying, you cannot sexually assault us in the workplace, et cetera, et cetera. There was this kind of wave of confidence. You know, I have two young daughters, like, girls learn as early as elementary school that they have to be kind of all these things, charming and pert and competent and interesting, and they should try to be pretty in order to evade kind of the male contempt that hangs in the world like. Like a cloud, like atmosphere. For the first time last decade, there was kind of visible female contempt in the air as well, you know, that you could maybe see through those mugs that said male tears, et cetera. And this tipped this particular community of men, the kind of men's rights manosphere people, into this reactionary, you know, political ideology that held like, women are subhuman, they are stupid, they're superficial, you know, they are lesser than usual. And luxmaxing came out of this paradigm of men, of the world of dating apps and men for the first time being judged the way that women have historically been judged by men. You know, men's bodies and faces for the first time, really, I think through dating app culture could be dissected the way that women's looks have always been dissected.
B
But here Gia is the part. Okay, so Gia, here's the part that I'm still trying to wrap my head around with this so clavicular is so popular. He gets other guys to also do this thing. They think that, you know, breaking their jaw kind of like helps make their jawline stronger and working out a lot and all of that kind of stuff. But for all of this obsession around their looks and being hot, you write that the looks maxers don't actually seem interested in sex. And there is a similar phenomenon with young women too. What is all this beauty for if not desire?
C
Right? So that's the thing, right? Because looks maxing is an ideology that came out of kind of explicitly anti woman thing. These are ostensibly straight men that are trying to become more beautiful. Where as I write, you know, in my kind of degraded millennial youth, if you wanted to get hotter really fast, you usually were trying to. Usually you were trying to have some sort of fun, exciting, new sex out of it. And that is so Conspicuously absent. It is, like you said, it is beauty. It is trying to summ kind of hotness, but with almost this unbelievably cold, hateful attitude towards not just the bodies of others, but even your own. Right. Eros is totally absent. There's no desire to get closer to the body of another person. When the looks maxers talk about women, who they call foids, short for female humanoids, they want to get hotter so that they can attract women, but as a display of dominance and conquest exclusively. Like any sense that it is pleasurable in and of itself to be with another person, to be intimate with another person, you know, to show yourself to another person and to be seen and to see them. That's so conspicuously absent from the way that they talk about their bodies and the bodies of others. And that too is part of the, the larger sense that, you know, we're decoupling from the physical entirely, which is so strange because we're talking about the face and the body.
B
So if it's not for desire, if it's not to attract someone, ultimately, who is it for?
C
Well, increasingly it seems to be for the disembodied collective. Right. It seems to be for the, for the virtual audience. Like there's this I feel, you know, I feel that I sense a kind of an eroticization of disembodied collective attention, like maximal likes maximal viewers. And again for, you know, for young people, that does kind of convert into maximal profit. I mean, clavicular only became clavicular because he's doing this all so ostentatiously that people will watch and he can make tapping himself on the jaw with a hammer on a twitch stream his full time job and actually get quite rich because of it. And so there's kind of an erotic through that almost of capital itself, which is again, probably the most anti human thing you could ever eroticize.
B
Are there other time periods that rhyme with this time period? I mean, you actually did gesture in your piece to the way that looks Maxers see race and disability kind of similar to how a eugenist would.
C
Yeah, if you go on the big looksmaxer forums, they have these message boards with all of these ways that you can improve your faces and bodies and they get really arcane. And yeah, it harkens because this is
B
all about face symmetry and all of those types of things. That's what we're talking about.
C
Yeah, and looksmaxing is overtly racist. The way that Instagram faced that was kind of tacitly racist. Looksmaxers are are pretty overtly white supremacist. They pretty overtly see the kind of white male quote unquote, Chad as kind of the alpha human and non white males as inferior. And the same with women. You know, it's a reactionary retreat against last decade's idea that what if everyone was worthy? It's a really clear reaction against that and a repudiation of that.
B
Let's talk a little bit about who's fighting against this trend. Because you mentioned before that you have written for several feminist publications in the past. Jezebel and the Hairpin, those feminist blogs from the 2010s. That whole ecosystem seems to have gone away. So what do you think was lost when those kinds of magazines closed and what's replaced them?
C
I don't think anything has replaced it. You know, the conspicuous absence of any women's media really, you know, let alone explicitly feminist media. Where 10 years ago there were, you know, there were many websites that were designated explicitly feminist that are basically not functioning or gone now. You can, you can feel the absence of it. You could feel it in the coverage of the Epstein files, of the Platner story, right? There is not a healthy conversation about women's lives and the political dimensions of it and these things. There's really no, there's been no replacement whatsoever. And I thought about. So I started. I worked at these websites in the 2010s, but when Jezebel launched in 2007, one of their first posts was kind of about this. They offered $10,000 to anyone who could give them a non retouched photo that had appeared on the COVID of a woman's glossy magazine. Because they said we are distorting what women actually look like in a way that is disciplinary and punitive and distorting our sense of who we are and what we should. Right? And they got that image. It was a, you know, it was an image of Faith Hill on the COVID of Redbook. And I thought, you know, 20 years later, how doesn't that feel wildly quaint to you? I mean, it feels, I found it so almost moving, right, that we. That we thought that we could still hold the line like this, that we thought that we. That we could push back in this way. And now we are swamped, you know, in a tsunami of unreality. And I think that right now, you know, it feels almost like I'm making a second wave argument even in talking to you about this, right? Like, I think what's replaced it is now this idea. There's almost no source. It's like when I was saying I Googled, like, should I get a facelift in my 30s? And the most cautionary words I could find were, no, no, no, just do Botox and filler instead. Right? There's a conspicuous absence of a critical feminist dialogue saying, here are the structural forces, here are the hierarchical, here's the economic laying out the political dimen of even something as superficial as what we're doing to our faces. They're real, and I do think they matter. And there is a there's an absence of publications. You know, Redbook is itself out of business. All the glossy magazines that Jezebel was protesting in the first place, they don't publish anymore.
B
If you're just joining us, my guest is New Yorker staff writer Gia Tolentino. Her new piece, our Plastic Surgery Nightmare, is about the rise of undetectable cosmetic surgery and what it's doing to our grip on reality.
C
Reality.
B
We'll be back after a short break. This is FRESH air.
A
This message comes from Jerry. Many people are overpaying on car insurance. Why switching providers can be a pain. Jerry helps make the process painless. Jerry is the only app that compares rates from over 50 insurers in minutes and helps you switch fast with no spam calls or hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year before you renew your car insurance policy. Download the Jerry app or head to Jerry AI NPR.
B
Every episode of It's Been a Minute. NPR's what's Happening in Culture podcast starts by asking three questions. Who?
C
How? Why now?
B
If the culture's asking it, we're talking about it at npr. We stand for your right to be curious and indulge your cultural curiosity. Follow It's Been A Minute wherever you get your podcast and we'll break down the zeitgeist y topics that are filling your feed. This is FRESH air, and today I'm talking with Gia Tolentino of the New Yorker. Her latest piece is about the new era of invisible plastic surgery, from six figure facelifts to AI generated faces and why she says it's eroding our connection to reality. Both you and I are parents navigating this world for our children. You mentioned your children earlier and you also wrote in your piece how Kylie Jenner, who was famous for, among other things, altering her face, says she'd be heartbroken if her daughter got surgery as a teenager. And I'm just wondering, when you look at your kids, what do you see coming for them? And what is your plan to Navigate it.
C
Let me illustrate this with an anecdote. So a few Months ago, my 5 year old daughter had seen a friend that, you know, had been handed a phone at drop off or had been handed a phone at pickup or something. She was like, mom, when can I get a phone? And my husband was walking through the hallway and he just started laughing. And my daughter was like, why did he laugh? And he was like, because I know that how much that broke her heart. And she was like, well, mom, why did that break your heart? And I was like, how do I explain this to a 5 year old? And what I said to her is, I was like, you, your imagination, your sense of freedom, your sense of what's possible is the most beautiful thing about you. And as soon as you get a phone, all of that will start to shrink, all of that will become endangered. The most wonderful things about you will be captured and rendered inadequate by the phone. And I think that's true, you know, with. I think that will be true with her. Inevitably, her relationship to her physical self. She'll find herself perfect and amazing until she sees the things on the screen that start to tell her, her, you know, you can find fault and you can improve. And you know, I guess I think about my own behavior as the only thing I can really control. You know, I. I guess I want her to see me valorizing the human and valorizing, you know, the actual human and not trying to improve and protect and beautify myself and my life in a way where it seems like that's a priority.
B
How do you do that? Because, I mean, you write that the beauty ideal is basically a mark of obedience. And then you admit on many days you still want it, you want to be seen as conventionally attractive. And I'm not gonna lie, even at my big old age, I want it too. So how do you even resist something that you still want?
C
Yeah, I think that's the question, right? I think that's the question that I hope that this piece raises. Right. And it's a larger question. It doesn't just have to do with beauty. How do we look at a world where the incentives are so anti human? And how do we deal with it? How do we live within it? And how do we. Where do we hold our ground? And I think the answer is specific to every person, but I think specifically with me. I wrote about optimization in my book in 2017, and after I wrote about it, it became clear that I could feel a difference within myself. I could feel a difference from wanting to perpetually improve and perfect versus trying to take care. And I think just on a personal level, that's the division I'm trying to draw for myself, right, that I can enjoy going to yoga, trying to get stronger, you know, I mean, I dye my hair blonde. You know, I wear makeup every day like I have no cred as, you know, a second wave radical that's resisting this altogether. And, you know, I don't think it's wrong to want to be beautiful. And there's one of the reasons I think there's a pleasure from a young age, we probably also understood there's kind of a pleasure in seeing, like, what could I be like? Girls are lovely. Girls want it self improved.
B
It's a rite of passage.
C
And the way that that gets captured by these systems is almost what I want to, you know, what I feel the desire to protect in my daughter. How do we separate the desire to kind of make something of yourself from the desire that will lead you straight to capture in all of these systems? And I think for me, I just never want her to see me becoming deranged by this, becoming actually captured by it. I think she will see me her whole life responding to it, living within the system. But I never want her to think, I never want her to see within me that the purpose of being a woman is to be as beautiful as possible all the time and to never look old, to never change, to always look like I did when I was 26, want her to see those incentives that exist on the Internet be written on my actual activities in life. And I hope I can hold myself to that for her sake, you know.
B
Gia Tolentino, thank you so much for this conversation.
C
Thank you so much for having me.
B
Gia Tolentino is a staff writer at the New Yorker. Her new piece is called Our Plastic Surgery Nightmare, tomorrow on FRESH air, The creator of the Netflix series Beef Lee Seung Giant, his second season about rage, class and blackmail at a country Club, just earned 16 Emmy nominations. He spent two decades writing for other people's shows before he started telling stories from his own life. I hope you can join us. To keep up with what's on the show and get highlights of our interviews. Follow us on Instagram @NPRFreshAir. Fresh Air's executive producer is Sam Brigger. Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham. Our engineer today is Adam Stanischewski. Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Phyllis Myers, Anne Marie Baldonado, Lauren Krenzel, Teresa Madden, Monique Nazareth, Thea Chaloner, Susan Yakundi, Anna Bauman and Nico Gonzalez. Our digital media producer is Molly CB Nesper. Roberta Shorrock directs the show with Terry Gross. I'm Tanya Moseley.
C
This season on Planet Money Summer School, we go to China, one of the world's biggest economies.
B
And what we learned is Americans are
C
crazy, Chinese are crazy.
B
These are two countries full of these crazy hustlers.
C
The US And China are more alike than you might think. On Planet Money Summer School school, a strange lesson about success, how to handle
B
the downsides of progress.
C
Listen on the NPR app or wherever
B
you get your podcasts. You might have heard of Nepo babies, maybe even Nepo parents. Now there's Nepo husbands, spouses or partners to high profile women riding on their coattails. On It's Been a Minute, we talk about the many shapes and forms they come in and the scrutiny they face. See what's shaping culture this week. Watch or listen to It's Been a Minute on the NPR app or YouTube.
Date: July 22, 2026
Host: Tonya Mosley
Guest: Jia Tolentino, staff writer at The New Yorker
In this incisive and probing episode, Tonya Mosley interviews Jia Tolentino about her New Yorker piece, "Our Plastic Surgery Nightmare." Tolentino charts the quiet revolution of cosmetic enhancement in America – its shift from visible and often-judged interventions to subtle yet extreme procedures, now pervading all levels of society, especially among increasingly younger demographics. They discuss how this phenomenon is altering not just appearances but the very idea of what it means to be human, as new beauty norms, aided by AI and social media, interact with society’s deepest anxieties about authenticity, race, and optimization.
The conversation is searching, reflective, and urgent, often personal but always analytical. Tolentino is both critical and empathetic, refusing to judge individuals but keenly interrogating the systems and collective shifts that shape increasingly anti-human standards. Mosley’s questions are candid, often introspective, and rooted in lived experience.
"Plastic Surgery Nightmare" is not a polemic against procedures, but an urgent meditation: on the meaning of the face, on beauty’s shifting mandate, and on how optimization culture, social media, and AI are converging to shape—and erase—what is specifically, vulnerably human. The episode leaves listeners pondering how to resist systems that would have us forget why imperfection, aging, and difference are precisely what make us real.
[END OF SUMMARY]