
Loading summary
A
Foreign. The Special Rapporteur in the occupied Palestinian territories comprising the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, is one of the singular most courageous voices against the ongoing genocide in Gaza and the savage repression meted out to Palestinians in the West Bank. Her detailed UN reports have been fearless examinations of the machinery of apartheid and genocide and Israel's disregard for international humanitarian law. She has been viciously attacked. The Trump administration ordered the U.S. department of treasury to classify her as a Specially Designated national, cutting her off from the global financial system and blocking any US citizen and corporation from engaging with her. All of her US assets have been frozen. She is unable to carry out routine financial transactions. She has paid for her courage and her honesty. Her book when the World Sleeps Stories, Words and Wounds of Palestine lifts up the voices of Palestinians, many of whom she knows and others in 10 short chapters to expose the human cost of Israel's occupation and mass slaughter. She draws from her own experience living in Palestine, weaving her chapters around individuals that give a human face to the suffering. These include Malik Matar, an artist who fled Gaza to Egypt and who suffers tremendous guilt for those he left behind, as well as Eyal Weissman, who opened her eyes to Israel's vertical politics, the three dimensional use of physical space employed by Israel to control airspace and subsoil as well as horizontal borders. She excoriates the Western press, the world's diplomats, for creating a false sense of equivalency in the conflict, as if Palestinians stand on equal footing with their occupiers. Palestinians do not have an air force, heavy weapons, mechanized units and navy, or billions in military aid from the United States and Israel's European allies. It cannot structurally subordinate Israelis control their movement and access to land, air and water or the flow of goods essential to maintain a minimum quality of life. To use words like war and conflict masks the truth. It presents a false version of reality. Israel's apartheid system and genocide cannot be stopped until it is acknowledged and understood, she writes. This requires not only knowledge but empathy. She fortunately is endowed with both. Joining me to discuss her new book, While the World Sleeps is Francesca Albanese. Francesca, I want to begin with the case of Dr. Hussein Abu Sayef. He has been jailed by the Israelis for 18 months, since 27 December 2024. He was the, of course, the head of the hospital in in Gaza and there's very disturbing news from his attorney, Nasser Oda. He's been moved to this underground prison Rockefeller, that used to be closed and Ben GVIR has reopened as no light. It's a severe detention facility. And when Dr. Abu Saif arrived for the attorney's visit, he was handcuffed, shackled and leg irons, accompanied by masked prison guards. And his attorney saw fresh and severe bruises on his body, especially on his head, around his eyes, ears and neck. And the lawyer said it was hard to recognize him. He struggled to breathe, he struggled to speak. He appeared extremely weak. He was terrified. He was in severe distress. He couldn't express himself for fear, he, he said, of retaliation. And he told his lawyer that after his hearing took place on June 10, 2026, regarding the appeal to the Supreme Court against the extension of his incarceration order, four or five prison guards entered his cell, beat him on all parts of his body with a hammer and batons, and he basically suffered daily violence, lost consciousness several times. And as you write in the book, this isn't the first time that Israeli doctors have died within Israeli prisons. You had Dr. Adnan Al Bush, a surgeon and head of orthopedics at Al Shifa. This was after severe torture, perhaps sexual torture. You had Dr. Aid Rantisi, the director of Kemal Adwan Hospitals Museum Paternity Unit. I just want to speak to this kind of very urgent case. His lawyer, physicians for Human Rights, Amnesty International and others are at this point saying, you know, his life is in danger. And I think he actually told his lawyer in court that this would be the last time that he was finished, I think, or something like this.
B
Thank you very much, Grace, for having me. The situation of Dr. Abu Safiyyah is extremely, extremely serious, extremely painful. He told his lawyer that he doesn't think he will survive. Imagine how painful it is for a man who's been unlawfully detained. He's held without charges, without trial, severely beaten, with signs of torture, as you said, I don't need to repeat, but I got this message from his family yesterday. They were imploring me to do something for their beloved one. And the sense of powerlessness is incredible. So there are three dimensions here. One, the fact that he's a very well respected doctor who's been injured himself, who has survived the loss of one of his children. His child was killed during this genocide. And this notwithstanding, he went back to work and he stayed there. He stayed in a hospital under siege. He said, I cannot leave my patients behind. He had to surrender to the Israeli army as a way not to have the hospital raided in any case, the patients were displaced anyway. And so what he's done to the man is incredible. Again, he's been held for 18 months now. And there is no charge, just proof, visible evidence of severe abuses. He's lost half of his weight, he's emaciated, he has visible signs of bruises, he looks terrified. And he's a doctor. This is part and parcel of a continuous, relentless attack that Israel has conducted against medical personnel, medical facilities that have been reduced to nothing. Which is also the way to ensure that whatever wound, whatever disease, whatever illness that the Palestinians trapped in the Gaza nightmare have, they won't be able to be cured. The second aspect is torture is heavily documented. I've had the first. I've reported with another Special Rapporteur who received the notice in already in January 2024, the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, Rima Al Salem. Violence, severe violence, abuse and r? Pe against female inmates. So we reported it. And after there have been denunciation from Pikati physician For human rights B'Tselem, multiple reports denouncing torture and the network of torture centers that Israeli prisons had turned into. Then the Committee on Israeli Practice, sorry, the Committee Against Torture, has documented the recourse to torture as a state policy. Later in 2025, I have documented torture after the Commission on Israel and Palestine also reported torture as an act of genocide. There is no doubt whatsoever that torture exists. And in the face of this, and this is the third element, what is shocking is the sense of impunity that Israel continues to enjoy because it's absolutely normal that there was a huge campaign to. To bring the Israeli hostages home. I just wonder why. There is a selective empathy and there is no campaign to bring the Palestinian hostages as Dr. Abu Safiyeh home. And there are 10,000 people detained by Israel who maintains an unlawful occupation. So this speaks to the moral decay
A
of
B
global leadership and also many of us lingo, you know, indifferent, enjoying the summer. Indifferently so.
A
This is from your book. The torture and killing of nearly a thousand health workers is a key component of the destruction of the health care system. You're quoting one of the people you write about, Hassan in the book. The Al Shifa hospital can rebuild in a couple of years. It took 12 years to train a doctor. He's talking about Dr. Adnan Al Bush was probably tortured to death. Considering the main medical specialists that Gaza urgently needs, it can be said that of the five pathologists present before October 7, only two are still alive in Gaza. There are no qualified doctors to perform emergency surgery. And then you talk about how a worker, a healthcare worker in Gaza is two and a half times more likely than any other individual to be killed. I Want to, I just want to stay on that. I think there. Doesn't Israel hold 18 Palestinian surgeons? That number, you know, may fluctuate or change, but I think it's about that. I just want to talk about the savagery directed at medical workers who don't carry weapons, who, you know, under international law, under the Geneva Convention, are completely exempt from, from being treated as combatants.
B
Israel has blurred the distinction between civilians and combatants times and times again during its occupation, its nearly 60 year long occupation of Gaza, the West bank and East Jerusalem. What it has done though in the last 1005, 1007 days is humanitarian camouflage. Israel has used the categories of international humanitarian law and capsized them. So it has, in order to have a more convincing narrative at the international level and reduce criticism, it has accused everyone, everyone in Gaza to be Hamas, a terrorist, a terrorist accomplice and two doctors were protecting Hamas. Hospitals were allegedly Hamas headquarters. I mean, you might remember an audience of. Remember the video that was shared simulating the presence of Hamas headquarters built underground under the Al Shifa hospital. It was a lie. You might remember the Israeli generals pointing to the Hamas schedule of attacks, which was. And a medical shift, in fact, just because it was written in Arabic. So it was easy to convince the audience that this was a Hamas planning found in a hospital. So this is how Israel has convinced ignorant people, or naturally pretends to bias people, that every doctor could be a potential terrorist, henceforth deserving to be punished, arrested, detained or killed, tortured, one, whatever, but so there is no civilian, no innocent civilian, as many, many leaders, many Israeli leaders have said. And therefore everyone was to be considered guilty until proven innocent. This has always been the norm. But they've endured a treatment which includes extrajudicial killing, torture. And again, this is the blowing of the international humanitarian legal system, meaning distinguish it, which is premised upon distinguishing between civilians and combatants, civilian objects and military personnel. So yes, you're right when you say but aren't medical personnel, medical workers and hospitals protected under international humanitarian law? Surely so, and for two reasons, both as civilians and second, because they serve an incredibly important and vital function in a situation of hostilities, helping continue to provide medical care. But this is exactly why Israel has targeted the medical system. This is why Israel has killed and tortured and maimed over a thousand medical personnel in order to make sure that the people in Gaza have no, no redress, no medical support. This is part and parcel, part and parcel of the genocide. What I find, however, incredibly disturbing is the fact that how. And again now I'm investigating as I speak the role of the media. There was a video that I shared from BBC speaking of Dr. Abu Safiyyah yesterday. It was a three minute, two minute, three minute video. And most of it, instead of talking about the torture, how visibly abused the doctor appears, the fact that he's been detailed without charge for 18 months, and the fact that he reports his fear of being killed, of having been taken in these dark places, in this dungeon in order to be killed. The journalist, the BBC journalist goes on and on and on saying, I mean, casting doubt about him as an Hamas acolyte. This is the point Western audiences do not even have the opportunity to understand what's happening because legacy media, instead of scrutinizing, has amplified the Israeli narrative. This is not journalism, this is complicity, complicity with genocidal propaganda, which has been
A
true from the beginning. Israel started attacking hospitals and at once denying that they were responsible. Although we now know from the genocide that this was Israeli policy from the beginning to eradicate the health care system. And the press dutifully reported these lies. We should also be clear that the only journalists on the ground in Gaza where Palestinian, over 250 of whom have been killed, large numbers, perhaps most in targeted assassinations. So I mean, you call your book While the World Sleeps. Unfortunately, much of the world, certainly the Western world and including the media, they didn't sleep at all. They were completely complicit.
B
Yeah, absolutely, absolutely. I think that like in any genocide, and I truly encourage people who feel so compassionate with, with Israel because of the Holocaust, I really encourage people to go and read for real what the Holocaust was and how Jewish people were treated before the Holocaust and even after the Holocaust because there was, I mean, since the, there has been such a manipulation of the memory of the Holocaust to serve the Zionist agenda. But the Jewish people have suffered transnational denigration from the media of the time as well. And this is so similar in a way to what's happening to the Palestinians, with the added element that in 2026 we have a legal framework which should have prevented certain phenomena of decay and moral collapse in light of what has happened in the past. So we like to claim, we, I say we in the so called west. But definitely the media has amplified what the Israeli narrative and contributed to portray the Palestinians as, yeah, part of the problem, to be, to be eradicated. Look what I the word sleep. But the word sleeps is part of indifference, part of lack of knowledge. But even those who know, even those who see seems to be paralyzed and they seem not to Understand that this moment of awakening requires action, requires change, change in every sphere of life. We cannot be the same in the time of genocide. This is the only thing that I keep on repeating over and over that there is hope for change and we will stop this genocide. The moment even that those who are awakened, we will, will be able to connect it, that awakening to a sense of action and responsibility.
A
Well, you write in the book, I think correctly, that the genocide in Gaza has kind of exposed a new and very frightening world order, one that has utter disregard for the rule of law. You write the crisis in Gaza is symptom of a global gaze, global crisis. I think more and more often that all of this, while it is bound to instill fear, must give us courage. The system that represses the Palestinians, a well established alliance between Israel and all the other states whose elites guarantee it, the impunity it has always enjoyed, is the same one to which we belong. It is the system that decides for us on issues that are crucial to our lives without listening to us and and representing us. It is the system that transforms secure jobs into part time and temporary work, rights into privileges, that alienates us from each other, making us all more fragile and insecure, that considers solidarity a subversive act and empathy a form of mental and social dysfunction. You actually talk about, for you, Palestine was the red pill in the Matrix. Talk about that place, Palestine and the genocide in that global context.
B
Yeah, I think those who have read the book, and then I'd like also to say a few words about how difficult it's been to have this book made available to the US readership because there has been such pressure from pro Israel support groups against it. You guess why. But yeah, for me, Palestine has been a revealer. It's not that all of a sudden we woke up in a world that is dominated by the U.S. i mean especially the world we are part of politically, militarily, strategically. The US is the dominant character here and Israel is a sort of extension of it in the Middle east is an extension of Western power and Western supremacy. I know that Israelis do not like it, but I do also believe that they do not realize how instrumentalized they are because of interests that are above all of us. We tend to think in terms of states as the ultimate decision makers. We think of it in democracies, we think of it in dictatorships. But in fact, I don't think that states are the decision makers. States today, more than more than before, more than a few decades ago, respond to certain interests, economic, military and financial Interests that are connected to the main, main power holders in this world. I mean, and there are numbers, what I'm saying, my sound conspiracy theorists to people who might not know enough about the inequality of the world. Thomas Piketty Institute in its inequality most recent inequality report mentions this data which I found shocking, staggering. The fact that half of the world population detains altogether one third of the wealth which is detained by 50,000 people in the world. I repeat, 15,000, sorry, 50,000 people in the world detain three times the wealth detained by half of the world population. How is it possible? Who are these? Clearly they are not just individuals like you and I. They, they detain pockets of power and it's those connected to the extractive industry for the control of natural resources, those connected to securing the use of force, military power and surveillance, and those connected to financial transactions, corporations and banks and pension funds. So these are the main powers with certain corporations like pharmaceuticals more influential than others or those related to tourism, for example. However, this is the brain power of those 50,000. With these 50,000 people. And today there is also the big tech. They are above, they are above the law. I mean, when you try to sue corporations, you are inundated with problems with issues with more legal issues with more legal, more litigation. And so it's impossible to face this. Palestine has revealed this world order. Palestine has been the epicenter of it because this is the reason why I was sanctioned for that report. The economy of occupation and economy of genocide that we discussed earlier last year, Chris, but again explaining to the world that while the economy of many Israeli families and individuals was collapsing, the stock exchange of Tel Aviv was rising, skyrocketing, doubling, tripling. Its value has been a revealer. So there was someone profiting from the genocide. And these are Palantir and the likes. These are Lockheed Martin and the likes, the military industry, not just Israeli and us, but all connect. And because we are connected. This is the second and last part of the story. We are part of it. We are part of it as consumers. We are part of it as producers because you know how many, sorry, trade union, sorry, how many trade unionists or workers I've been speaking with over the past two years. You know how many consumers I've been speaking to and they say the same, yeah, but you know how difficult it is to get out of this market. You know that we would like not to, not to work for this company, which is, for example, connected in Italy to the military industry, like Leonardo. But they're scared of losing their job. They realize that they are used as part of that. Their fragility is part of the system because they have to choose between producing weapons that is used to kill children and not working at all. This means that we are part of or we are seeing pockets of populations who are just sacrificial. Sacrificially. They are sacrificial entities, sacrificial beings. And probably we can change this order. This is the other thing that Palestine is telling us. Through boycotting, divesting, we can break the ties of the system and through sanctions we can curtail the complicity with Israel. But these requires individual commitment.
A
And I should say I was in Italy with you last November, joining the dock workers who have refused to load weapons onto Israeli ships. I think both you and I feel that is where all of our energy should go, that kind of blockage of the system. People can watch an hour documentary on it called Resistance 101. If you type in my name and Resistance 101. You write in the book that when you were at the School of Oriental and African Studies, you discovered two fundamental things. The first was that Palestine could and should be discussed as a legal issue of protracted institutional and systematic illegality, not simply as a political issue, but with opposing claims. The second thing you said you discovered was the encounter with law firms influenced by critical race theory, a way of understanding law in a critical and decolonial key, framing it in the historical evolution, not necessarily written by the victors, but observed from the perspective of the people who until recent times have been subjected to international law as it has been formulated above all by Western countries. I do want to talk about the sanctions against your book, but just address those two points if you could. First.
B
Absolutely. And even here I think that Palestine epitomizes what happens to, let's say, to the most disadvantaged part of the. Of the world, the former colonies, people whose indigeneity has been experienced as a toll, as almost as a crime in the eyes of the colonizer. Palestine are among them. And Palestine have always been projected as potential savages in the Western. For example, when I think of Western media, they're always the ones deemed barbaric or recurring to violence like it happens. I mean, the discourse concerning Arab people, Muslim people, is so vicious, violent, violent, that I say, how do we not reconnect the. Connect the dots and understand that this is the way we were talking about the Jewish people 100 years ago and probably less some, because there is still antisemitism and we should talk of the real antisemitism Instead of apartheid, Israel's paranoia and manipulation of what antisemitism means. But however, I think that for a long time, Palestinians have been, even by those well intended, proposed, presented as a humanitarian issue, as a humanitarian issue to be managed instead of critical political issue to be resolved in line with international law. For example, now the International Court of Justice, so there is an international tribunal which has pronounced itself on the fact that the occupation is unlawful. Henceforth, it is to be dismantled totally and unconditionally. The deadline was September 2025. No one is talking about that. But this is why I say international law already offers a roadmap, a way out of this quagmire. And instead the situation continues to be treated as if it was a humanitarian emergency after a earthquake or after a flood. I think that this is part of the problem, which is also intimate to what has gone wrong within the United Nations. However, international law has been used often as part of the problem, because I remember 15 years ago, it was unthinkable to look at the occupation as a whole, as a whole illegal endeavor. Even those who were progressive back then used to refer to the legality of the occupation because of Israel's occupation violating such and such provision of international humanitarian law, for example, abusing the detainees or translating into abusive practices toward leading to home demolitions, punitive home demolition. So it was criticized because of its excesses, but not ontologically, not in its entirety, which today is normal. And I think it's because there has been finally a shift, I hope to, as a special reporter, to have helped that effort. But there has been a shift from the addressing the symptom type of approach to looking at the overall phenomenon of the legality of the occupation. Critical studies have played an enormous role. And critical studies are primarily animated by scholars from the global majority, from South Africa, from Kenya, from Nigeria, from Palestine, from indigenous scholars themselves, from Australia or Canada and the United States. Yeah. And so. Or Asia. And this is beautiful. I think that this has helped us progress as lawyers. But of course, of course there is still a lot of patronizing attitude and, and chauvinism in legal studies, as in many other disciplines and realm.
A
So let's talk about what's happened to the book. But let's begin with the broader sanctions. You were sanctioned, as I mentioned in the introduction, you won a court case that lifted those sanctions, and then the Trump administration turned around and reimposed them. And that, of course, has. I mean, you can talk about that process that has affected your, your ability to even publish and disseminate this book?
B
In a way, yes. In a way, yes, absolutely. Because the sanctions, I mean, I would like people to spend a moment to reflect upon what freedom of expression means. Because here we are outside the physiology of a democratic debate. The moment you prevent someone you do not agree with to speak, this is no longer a liberal space. You and I do not have to agree. People can disagree with me, but I will always protect the right of those who think different from me to speak. Because this is the essence of a democratic space. This is the essence of protection of freedom of expression all the more. I mean, I'm protected as a UN person who's voluntarily. I mean, I serve on a pro bono basis, just for those who are wondering, the United nations. And I'm a protected person under the Convention on Privileges and Immunities. So I shouldn't face consequences for words spoken or words, sorry, actions taken in the exercise of my mandate, in the execution of my mandate. Instead, I've been sanctioned at very severe instruments taken normally against drug dealers or dictators in the US at this time to sanction me, the judges and prosecutors of the International Criminal Court who have investigated Israel's crimes and Palestinian human rights organizations who have provided evidence for those trials. So you see, there is also such an attempt to strangle and tamper with evidence and strangle the international justice system that the US helped to create after, with the Nuremberg trial and after the Nuremberg trial. So it's vicious. And because of it, people in the US cannot entertain financial interactions with me of any nature. Including a glass of water is the commission of a felony, which means up to 20 years in jail and up to $1,000 in fines for those who are caught producing. I mean, provoking an economic advantage to me. So even my publisher, Aldepress, has faced huge pressure. They had to hire a lawyer in order to find a way to publish the book. Because Judith Gurevich, who really wanted, who really liked the book, and she was the first one, the first one other press has been the first one to offer to translate the book, which is now available in 60 countries and in 20 languages. But the English one should have been the first to come out in the us in Australia and in the uk. But apart from the longer process of publishing in the us, there has been a huge opposition in order not to have my book published and distributed. So I said, look, I don't care. I don't need to claim the copyright of this as I'm sanctioned. I don't want the publisher to go in trouble. I want people to read this book. So we found a way for me to keep on sort of working pro bono even as a writer. And I said, doesn't matter, I still want the book to be read. And this was the only agreement we could find to have this when the World Sleeps available on US Bookstores. One thing is that, yeah, because the United nations and no other states, certainly not Italy, found the courage to stand before the International Court of Justice bringing a case against the US for violation of privileges and immunities of a UN person. My 13 year old daughter and my husband works for a US based organization who are clearly directly impacted by the fact that my assets in the U.S. we own a small apartment in the U.S. where my daughter was born. It's been taken, it's been frozen, my bank account was shut down and I've not been able to open a bank account anywhere else. So I cannot be paid, I cannot be reimbursed even for medical expenses. And even my private insurance doesn't reimburse me anymore. You know, it's a very heavy situation and because it affects my entire family, they recur to justice. So they, because the United nations didn't even give me the possibility to defend myself in court. So my 13 year old daughter brought to court President Trump and Secretary of State Rubio and others involved in the sanction. And the first instance, a federal judge in the First District Court in Washington D.C. recognized the fact that the proceeding appeared to be not to be right, to have persecuted me just for exercising freedom of expression and so proposed to suspend the sanctions. And then because of the system and because of the fact that there are judges appointed by the executive, there was an appeal against the suspension of the order of the sanctions. And now I need to wait until the judge pronounce itself in a merit. So on the merit, so I'm still sanctioned by the US
A
let's talk a little bit about Gaza. In the book you write about President Trump, this is you has repeatedly intimidated anyone who dares to touch Israel, saying that they will have to, quote, deal with us. A threatening language, unbefitting of politics as we have known it until now, but which is entirely consistent with the substance of what Trump himself said when he declared, quote, everyone I've spoken to likes the idea that the United States owns that piece of land. Referring to the Gaza Strip in this sentence you write, there is all the violence of an unbridled power that can achieve everything through force. Because like caligula of the 21st century, he considers himself above the law. In fact, he doesn't even know the law. I want to talk about his proposal for Gaza. And of course Hamas has said that they would step aside for technocratic government. I don't think that any appeasement that Hamas makes is going to placate Netanyahu. But let's address that.
B
Yeah. First of all, I think that you are the first interviewer who picks on the fact that I, I speak, I define Trump, the Caligula of our time. Someone who's. Yeah, but it's real. I mean, you don't need to be an expert on Roman history to understand what Caligula's features were. And the absolute arbitrary power unconstrained by the law, the extreme narcissism and self aggrandizement, capriciousness and erratic nature of power, the humiliation of opponents, the cult of personality, all of this, all of this makes me think of Caligula, the Roman emperor. So I said when Trump came out, when President Trump came out, this Gaza riviera thing in February 2025, I said three things. It's unlawful because the United States has no right whatsoever to decide or to speak decisively of the future of Gaza or the rest of the occupied Palestinian territory or Palestine, Palestine or frankly, any part of the world, full stop. Because there is something called the right of self determination of people. And the Palestinians have the right of self determination vis a vis Israel, vis a vis the United States and anyone else. It's unlawful. And these would entail, this would embroil the United States in a different set of crimes, like the crimes of forced displacement, because these would entail the forced displacement of Palestinians. And as Israel is doing. I said it's unlawful and it's immoral because what on earth would push the President of the United States to say something so disrespectful toward the population at the time of the of greatest suffering that the latter is enduring. And then I said it's irresponsible because it will foster more, it will, it will prompt more sense of impunity and license to kill, torture and displace among the Israeli leaders, which is in fact what does happen. So it's unlawful, immoral, irresponsible. This is what I said and this is what I think still. However, I also think that the Gaza Riviera is a distraction. I don't think that anyone is really planning to have a Riviera in Gaza. Gaza has been ungrounded. Gaza has been made unlivable. I already started researching for a next report I want to write about ecocide so. But what this current US administration is surely champion of, among many, is psychological overwhelming of its audiences, including us in Europe. Every day in this part of the world, in Europe, we wake up with a new shocking thing said by President Trump. Might be the Gaza Riviera, or might be that this intervening in the World cup in a way that only Caligula would do if it was with us today in 2026. Because the level of. Really. Yeah. The level of self restraint, the inexistence of restraint of this man is incomparable, incommeasurable. So I do think that this is a way to distract us from the real plans of again displacing the Palestinians and using Gaza as an extension of Israel. But probably for economic purposes. I keep on thinking of why Netanyahu has brandished over and over the plan to have a gas duct that goes through from the Arab countries, Gulf countries, into the Mediterranean, through southern Israel and probably Gaza, because this is something that is going to be convenient for Israel. But in any case, whatever the plan they might have, it remains unlawful, immoral and irresponsible.
A
Well, we should be clear. There are extensive gas fields in southern Lebanon and on the northern coast of Gaza that Israel wants.
B
Exactly, exactly. And this is why there is need to scrutinize each and every company involved in it, because these amounts for the companies themselves in the crime of pillage, you know, recently, and I can think that it was also following external pressure from myself, the working group on business and Human rights, Italian civil society, and probably also internal, from conscientious people working for the company that the energy giant ENI went out of the consortium to exploit those fields of gas, offshore gas in Gaza. And again, this is why we need to pressure both states and companies to disengage and divest from the Israeli occupation.
A
Well, those gas fields are in territorial waters of Lebanon and. And Palestine, correct?
B
Yes. These gas fields are outside Lebanon, outside historical Palestine. So Israel and Gaza, Gaza toward Egypt.
A
I want to close with you write about this, about children and what's done to children by Israel. You write, I attended several trials against minors. I have seen with my own eyes their absurd brutality. You're talking about the Israelis. The children were brought into the courtroom in chains. And I felt like I was watching scenes of slaves in labor camps, small, emaciated, exhausted, anxious at the thought that for the first time since their arrest, they would be seeing their parents again. In these hearings that lasted no more than a few minutes, the judge often did not even look at them. He heard the Charge he was throwing stones and handed down the sentence, two years in prison, three years in prison, and so on. And that's a generous judge, given that the punishment for Palestinians who throw stones is up to 10 years, 20 if done with the intention of harming someone. How can anyone be surprised that when jailed, Palestinian children return home, they are traumatized, do not want to go out, are afraid, wet the bed and exhibit disturbances or violent behavior. We are talking about 12, 13, 14 year old kids, but even younger kids are arrested. There were children as young as five or six being taken away by Israeli trucks, perhaps not detained, but interrogated and then sent home. Let's talk about this. And of course, this war on children is reached, you know, epic kind of proportions in Gaza where children, if they walk too close to the yellow line, are just killed by snipers.
B
It's interesting, Chris, because I said exactly, I used exactly the same words you just used a few weeks ago in another interview saying the war on childhood has reached epic proportions in Palestine. And you can see that, I mean, it was already quite bad probably when you and I were living, I mean, at the various times we've been living in Palestine. But it has, because there has never been the possibility to enjoy childhood for kids who risk to have their homes demolished, their schools demolished, their teachers, parents, uncles either killed or arrested and then returning like zombies because they've been beaten and tortured and sometimes raped in prison and so coming back and having so much repressed rage, anger and violence. So the entire life of a Palestinian child is contaminated by violence, is hijacked by violence. And over decades, the horizons of hope has been shrinking and shrinking. But what I've seen happening in the last 1,005 days since October 2023 is of another, of another leak, because I've seen, I mean, and this interrogates both Israelis, Israelis who think they are bystanders and bystanders around the world. What else? Whatever you qualify, what Israel does. But have you seen the bodies of the kids turned into pieces? Have you seen bodies of kids hanging, of what remains of them hanging from walls as if they were coats? Have you seen mutilated bodies? Have you seen children? I mean, Gaza is the place with the highest level of, highest number or highest ratio of orphan children in the world, amputated children in the world. And now there is starvation and there is misery, there is malnutrition. Stunting, stunting was already an issue before, during the blockade, before the tightening of the blockade, after October 23rd. And you don't even need to go to Gaza, look at the west bank where Palestinians live, including children live under threat of being assaulted by soldiers or under constant threat of settlers terror. Who would like to live in a system like that? And again, it didn't start on October 2023. It's been ongoing for decades. And again, I can only say the only way forward is that we say to Israel's no more and we let children to enjoy a bit of life. Look, there is a, there is the first chapter of my book because each chapter, for those who have not read it, each chapter has a sort of Virgil in Dante's Divine Comedy is a character who's been, who's a real person, who has existed for real. Most of them are friends of mine who have been, belong to my life. Except for one, Hindra Jab, the child who gives the name to the chapter. I wrote this chapter in January 2025, so one year after Hind's death. So this was not as famous. It was a well known case among many, among thousands, but not as well known as it is today and still is. One among hundreds of thousands is one of the tens of thousands of children brutally killed by the Israeli army. And then the chapter talks about my experience with Palestinian children, which has been beautiful and uplifting, but still these kids carry a weight and preoccupations that is not for any child to hold, any child to carry.
A
Well, you write in the book that when you actually did, I think when you were in Palestine and working for the un, you did a report on children, but you talked about how these young children would speak to you and they sounded as if they were adults.
B
Yeah, yeah. It's almost disturbing at times because there is someone in our mind. I mean, again, and these. It's not that I don't have biases. I mean, I try to be as open as possible, but you know, I have two children myself and so I have my own way to measure the maturity of a child. So when you find that 10 year old or a 13 year old who starts mentioning right to education, right to food, right to health, to say, you know, maybe he's been taught to speak like that because they had to meet with me. But I have met these kids times and times again because I've had focus groups, often with the same children. And I came to know them a little bit during two, three months of investigation, even if I couldn't go there. I mean, I spent the summer of 2024, July and August and part of September, speaking almost every day to Palestinian children. And I can tell you the Reason why they are so knowledgeable is because they've been forced to grow so fast and still find a peaceful way to overcome the horror in front of and around them. So the fact that I could find almost destabilizing the fact that they were speaking as young lawyers, as I say in the book, is out of despair. They try to remain safe in a world and healthy, mentally healthy in a world that is horrifically unhealthy for them and horrifically unfair to them.
A
And of course, one of the chapters centers around Gabor Mate, who, you know, who deals with this kind of trauma.
B
Yes, I had a beautiful, beautiful talk with Gabor Mate about my book, when the World Sleeps a couple of days ago, and we were talking about the characters in the book, what they evoke. It was weird for him at a certain point to say, I'm also a character in there. And he wanted to. Yeah, he asked me if I feel like screaming at times. Yeah, I wish. I wish. I don't. I don't know. Yes, of course, at times you want to scream at politicians who seem like dead men walking, but dead men walking not because death is awaiting them at the next corner. It's just because they seem empty of life, empty of humanity. I say, but what else do you need to see? Whatever you want to call it. But what else does Israel need to do and say for you to take measures, for you to take international law seriously and do it? Because by letting Israel ravage the realm of international law with impunity, you're also destroying the foundations of. Of the international legal system. And, yeah, I feel. I mean, I feel the pain, but it's also a weird way of how we protect ourselves by numbing the pain. And so I think that I will probably be able to process what I. The trauma of this. I mean, the secondary trauma of being exhausted because nothing compares to what the Palestinians endure. The Palestinians in Gaza, The Palestinians. The Palestinians in the west bank and East Jerusalem, the Palestinians in the diaspora. But our secondary trauma, by being exposed, by being witnesses to this, I will probably be able to deal with it once the genocide is over. Because right now I really try to stay healthy and focused on how to bring this to an end. Because it's not over. And people need to understand that the end of injustice doesn't happen because we want it or because we pray for it. We need to act. There are things that we need to do and we need to persevere. It doesn't matter if it takes one day, 10 days, 100 days, or 1,000 days. We need to persevere. This is the only way to win over injustice.
A
Well, it took us 14 years to get Julian Assange free, so, yeah, that's a long fight. But you're certainly one of the most important figures in that fight for justice. Thank you, Francesca. And I want to thank Thomas and Max, who produced the show. You can find me@chrishedges.substack.com thank you.
B
Thank you so much, everyone. Thank you. Chris, Sam.
Episode: What Happens 'When the World Sleeps' (with Francesca Albanese)
Date: July 8, 2026
Host: Chris Hedges
Guest: Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur
This episode centers around the ongoing crisis in Gaza, examining the reality of occupation, genocide, and the global complicity in Israel’s actions against Palestinians. Chris Hedges interviews Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories and author of When the World Sleeps: Stories, Words and Wounds of Palestine. Together, they discuss her personal experiences, her UN reports, her suffering under U.S. sanctions, and the wider implications of global indifference.
The episode features in-depth exploration of the destruction of Gaza’s healthcare system, the targeting and torture of medical professionals, the manipulation of Western media, global structures of impunity, the exploitation of resources, and the systematic trauma inflicted on Palestinian children.
[00:25 – 10:52]
“Torture is heavily documented… there is no doubt whatsoever that torture exists. And in the face of this… what is shocking is the sense of impunity that Israel continues to enjoy”
— Francesca Albanese ([07:00] B)
[15:22 – 18:35]
[18:35 – 25:51]
“Palestine has revealed this world order. Palestine has been the epicenter of it… because we are connected.”
— Francesca Albanese ([21:55] B)
[25:51 – 27:17]
[27:17 – 31:40]
"International law already offers a roadmap, a way out... But the situation continues to be treated as if it was a humanitarian emergency."
— Francesca Albanese ([29:45] B)
[31:40 – 37:55]
[37:55 – 45:21]
"Whatever the plan they might have, it remains unlawful, immoral and irresponsible."
— Francesca Albanese ([43:34] B)
[45:21 – 54:09]
“The entire life of a Palestinian child is contaminated by violence, is hijacked by violence.”
— Francesca Albanese ([48:15] B)
[54:09 – End]
“The end of injustice doesn’t happen because we want it or because we pray for it. We need to act… We need to persevere.”
— Francesca Albanese ([56:00] B)
“There is a selective empathy and there is no campaign to bring the Palestinian hostages home… So this speaks to the moral decay of global leadership.”
— Francesca Albanese ([07:15] B)
“To use words like ‘war’ and ‘conflict’ masks the truth. It presents a false version of reality.”
— Chris Hedges ([04:45] A)
“We cannot be the same in the time of genocide… The moment even those who are awakened connect it to a sense of action and responsibility, we will stop this genocide.”
— Francesca Albanese ([17:55] B)
“States today… respond to certain interests, economic, military and financial interests that are connected to the main power holders in this world.”
— Francesca Albanese ([20:57] B)
“It's also a weird way of how we protect ourselves by numbing the pain. And so I think that I will probably be able to process… the secondary trauma… once the genocide is over. Because right now, I really try to stay healthy and focused on how to bring this to an end.”
— Francesca Albanese ([55:00] B)
The conversation is a searing indictment of international complacency and complicity in the face of documented atrocities. It makes a passionate case for clarity, empathy, and actionable solidarity, urging listeners to break cycles of violence through pressure, boycott, divestment, and direct action. Albanese’s courage is underscored by the personal cost of her advocacy and the power of her storytelling, ultimately reminding us that “the end of injustice doesn’t happen because we want it… We need to act.”