
The former Secretary of State says that Benjamin Netanyahu and others tried to get her on board with an Iran attack. It was Trump who finally took the bait.
Loading summary
Hillary Clinton
WNYC Studios is supported by Quince Summer
Lisa
is finally here and that means it's time to rethink how I get dressed every morning. Goodbye, warm and cozy and hello light and breathable. But I still want to look put together and that's why I keep coming back to Quince. They focus on high quality essentials that look and feel so good all in summer fabrics like breathable linen and soft organic cotton Premium basics without the premium markup so I can look elevated and effortless without taking a hit to my wallet. Need some base layers? Their tees are soft, sleek and easy to wear and if you need some defense against the office AC blast, the organic cotton sweaters are gorgeous. Summer's a great time to refresh your home too. Quint's offers custom upholstered sofas, ceramic cookware, premium bedding and so many other beautiful things for your living space. I'm really finding myself recommending Quince to everyone for everything I have been living in. Their micro ribs cotton tanks so cute for the summer heat and and when I need something extra, their denim jacket pairs with those tanks beautifully. Elevate your summer wardrobe. Go to quint.com radiohour for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com radiohour for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com radiohour the New Yorker Radio Hour
Hillary Clinton
is supported by Lisa this spring I'm
Lisa
really focusing on my health and one of the most important parts of a healthy lifestyle is a good night's sleep. That's why I upped my sleep game by replacing my old mattress. I switched to the Sapira hybrid model from Leesa and the difference has been forgive me night and day. I'm falling asleep faster, staying asleep longer, and waking up feeling refreshed in a way that just wasn't happening with my old mattress. That's because Leesa crafts beautiful mattresses with premium materials in a wide range of firmness options so you can choose the sleeping experience that's right for you. Take the Leesa Sleep Quiz and find out which mattress is your best fit. Plus, Leesa is committed to eco friendly materials and sustainable manufacturing practices and partners with organizations like Clean Hub and Green Worms to help remove harmful plastic waste from the environment. I know that helps me sleep a little easier. Go to leesa.com for 25% off select mattresses plus get an extra $50 off with promo code New Yorker exclusive for my listeners. That's Leesa.com promo code newyorker for 25% off select mattresses plus an extra $50 off support our show and let them know we sent you after checkout. Lisa.com promo code New Yorker the New
Sponsor Announcer
Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort, offering destination focused small ship experiences on all seven continents with a shore excursion included in every port and programs designed for cultural enrichment. And every Viking voyage is all inclusive with no children and no casinos. Learn more@viking.com
Narrator/Producer
the New Yorker Radio Hour is a co production of WNYC and the New Yorker.
David Remnick
Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. I last sat down with Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2017. Clinton was still working through everything that had gone so badly wrong the year before, how she'd lost the election and how Donald Trump had come to occupy the White House. Trump had campaigned with a chant of lock her up. A threat that electrified so many of his supporters. Clinton, for them, was not merely a political opponent, but somehow the embodiment of evil. Now it's been almost a decade, and Donald Trump has, for the most part, moved on to yet other enemies. But Clinton remains very much a power broker in the Democratic Party and a leader of its centrist wing. She's also a voice of authority on US Foreign policy with the Clinton Foundation. She's advocated for bringing down the cost of AIDS drugs worldwide and getting phones out of classrooms. I sat down with Hillary Clinton again this past week to talk about the war in Iran, Joe Biden's doomed campaign for the presidency, and how America might perhaps begin to move beyond Trumpism. We met on Stage at the 92nd Street Y in New York City. Secretary Clinton, in your book Something Lost, Something Gained, you write about your state of mind after the election of Donald Trump. You describe yourself as someone who remains an optimist that worries a lot. Now, we all worry. But I want to grasp the extent of your agony. And I want to begin with a big question. Does Donald Trump and Trumpism represent a real and sustained era of authoritarianism in this country?
Hillary Clinton
I really believe that he does represent the threat of authoritarianism. And the people who enable him, who support him, who follow him, have clearly decided that his kind of performance, politics, his deliberate cruelty, is exactly what they want to see for the country. Now, the good news is his favorability is in, you know, the mid-30s. But he is doubling down. He's doubling down on his impulsiveness and it's very Worrisome to me. You know, I teach at Columbia University now, of course, with the dean there. It's called Inside the Situation Room. And we talk about the traits of leaders, their behavior, their psychology. And there is a view that is rooted in how people make decisions, all of us, not just leaders, about what happens when someone finds themselves in what's called the domain of loss. It's a psychological concept. And almost counterintuitively, when people feel they are losing, they very frequently take greater risks. They double down on their behavior. And that's what I'm now worried about, because he's lashing out. He's demanding that we accept his version of reality, which is unhinged from the actual world that we live in and the actual consequences of his actions. So I think we have to be extremely vigilant and just ready to push back every chance we get.
David Remnick
How has your understanding of his support evolved? You were criticized a lot, probably rightly, for using the word deplorables for many of his followers. But how do you view the evolution of his followers and what it is that they want most of all from him?
Hillary Clinton
Well, first of all, I said only about half were. So to be fair.
David Remnick
Well, are you doubling down on deplora?
Hillary Clinton
I was, you know, I gave a speech, for example, about something called the alt right, which, you know, the press had no idea what I was talking about, certainly the public had no idea what I was talking about. But, you know, I was beginning to see this really disturbing rhetoric, racist rhetoric, sexist rhetoric, you know, the kind of authoritarian, demagogic claims about our politics. And it worried me. So, you know, I tried to kind of put that into the political debate. But I also did try to, you know, draw a line between those who were following him because of that. It wasn't a bug, it was the feature. And people didn't take it seriously. People were like, oh, that's just Donald. He's just spouting off. Don't worry about it. I saw something darker, but, you know, I was in not the strongest position since I was running against him to make that case. So I was trying to say, look, I understand there are people who believe that kind of stuff, but most of the people, at least half who are, you know, following him, they want change. They are not satisfied with where we are in the country. It was something that, you know, I was aware of and I respected because people were feeling that, you know, it's hard to succeed a two term president of your own party. I knew that going into it and, you know, People liked and respected President Obama, but, you know, they wanted something that might be a little different and a little different, but they didn't know how different at the time.
David Remnick
I don't want to jump too far ahead, but I think it's fair to say that so far, J.D. vance has not covered himself in glory, and Marco Rubio probably doesn't appeal to the base with quite the same stick to itiveness of Trump himself. And I wonder if you think it's possible, and I think maybe this has run through your head, that the Trump family has dynastic ambitions, whether it's Donald Jr. Or someone in the family who might pretend to succeed him.
Hillary Clinton
Well, David, you and I think alike. I think, number one, if he could figure out a way to stay, he would. My husband likes to say, if he tries to stay, I'm running again. But if that's unlikely, which we have to hope it is, I don't get the feeling he's all warm and fuzzy about J.D. vance. I don't think he is warm and fuzzy about nearly anybody other than himself. And who is closest enough to him, and that is possibly a son or a daughter.
David Remnick
A son or a daughter.
Hillary Clinton
A son or a daughter.
David Remnick
And the daughter is thought to be cleverer than the son.
Hillary Clinton
Well, I'm not gonna characterize them. It's the blood relationship that matters.
David Remnick
Understood.
Hillary Clinton
So, look, I mean, we're speculating like, you know, we know something which we don't. I'm not hanging out in Mar a Lago and sort of picking up the, you know, breadcrumbs of gossip, but I think that.
David Remnick
I think you'd like it.
Hillary Clinton
Yeah, but given his psychology, given, you know, Trump's psychology, he definitely, if he can't do it himself, he wants somebody he can control and preferably somebody related to him. And that would be, I think, his, you know, his hope.
David Remnick
You've watched Trump over a long period of time. You've debated him three times. You've observed him very carefully, obviously. Is he disintegrating?
Hillary Clinton
I think he is certainly not what he was, you know, falls asleep and lots of public meetings. I mean, poor Joe Biden. I mean, shut his eyes once or twice, but Donald Trump is, like, falling asleep all the time these days. But part of that is he stays up all night posting on True Social. So he's, you know, he's not getting enough sleep anyway, which is pretty disturbing because I don't think people who are sleep deprived make good decisions on top of everything else. But I really think he has a number of traits that have gotten more obvious. He doesn't even try to hide them. His impulsivity, his immaturity, his lack of curiosity about anything going on around him that like when he launched the war against Iran. And then out of the White House. You hear that? Nobody told me about the Strait of Hormuz. I mean, nobody told me they could close the Strait of Hormuz. Where is the Strait of Hormuz? You know, you can't make it up. It's like some movie that you walk out of because it's so outlandish.
David Remnick
Dr. Strangelove.
Hillary Clinton
Yeah, exactly.
David Remnick
Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. The day we spoke, the administration announced an agreement or a memorandum of understanding to end the war with Iran. We'll pick up right there in just a moment. This is the New York Radio Hour with more to come.
Sponsor Announcer
The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by AT&T. Summer is great for many reasons. The best reason our plans we made finally making it out of the group chat because there's more time to fit everyone in whatever you've got in store this summer, capturing those memories is a must. And AT&T has your summer essential in the iPhone 17 Pro. Its center stage front camera auto adjusts the frame to fit everyone into group selfies. You don't even have to turn your phone. No awkward cropping or asking strangers to take it. Just the perfect group selfie every time. And ATT makes sharing those moments with everyone easy because you gotta share the pic or it didn't happen, right? Right now at, at and t ask how you can get iPhone 17 Pro on them with eligible trade in requires Eligible plan terms and restrictions apply. Subject to change. Visit att.comiphone or visit an ATT store for details.
Hillary Clinton
WNYC Studios is supported by decagon.
Sponsor Announcer
The best customer experiences happen when customers feel like they're the only one. Almost like they have their own concierge. But once more and more requests start to come in, a lot of Companies turn to AI and lose that personal touch. Decagon helps companies create personalized concierge style customer experiences with AI agents across chat, email, voice and SMS. They're available 24, 7, feel natural to talk to, and can resolve customer requests on their own. And so businesses can keep up with requests without losing their personal touch. Decagon plugs directly into your existing systems so agents can get live quickly. And because workflows can be updated using natural language, teams can make changes themselves without long engineering cycles. They give your team full visibility into why agents make decisions and what's happening across every conversation so it's easier to spot trends and improve the experience over time. Decagon helps power millions of conversations every day. Ready to transform your customer support? Go to Decagon AI New Yorker to get a personalized demo and see what Decagon can do for your team. Check decagon out at Decagon AI New Yorker. That's Decagon AI New Yorker Radio Hour
is supported by USA for unhcr, the UN refugee agency in Ukraine, Sudan and around the world. War is tearing millions of families from their homes. Despite funding cuts, UNHCR continues to provide protection, shelter and emergency relief to displaced families in more than 120 countries worldwide. For more information, visit unrefugees.org radiohour the
Hillary Clinton
New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by
Lisa
Lisa this spring I'm really focusing on my health and one of the most important parts of a healthy lifestyle is a good night's sleep. That's why I upped my sleep game by replacing my old mattress. I switched to the Sapira hybrid model from Leesa and the difference has been, forgive me, night and day. I'm falling asleep faster, staying asleep longer, and waking up feeling refreshed in a way that just wasn't happening with my old mattress. That's because Leesa crafts beautiful mattresses with premium materials in a wide range of firmness options so you can choose the sleeping experience that's right for you. Take the Leesa Sleep Quiz and find out which mattress is your best fit. Plus, LEESA is committed to eco friendly materials and sustainable manufacturing practices and partners with organizations like Clean Hub and Green Worms to help remove harmful plastic waste from the environment. I know that helps me sleep a little easier. Go to leesa.com for 25% off select mattresses. Plus get an extra $50 off with promo code New Yorker exclusive for my listeners. That's Leesa.com promo code New Yorker for 25% off select Matt an extra $50 off. Support our show and let them know we sent you after checkout Lisa.com promo code New Yorker
David Remnick
this is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick and I've been speaking with Hillary Rodham Clinton while serving in the Senate. Clinton ran for the presidency in 2008, and shortly after Barack Obama won that historic election, he appointed Clinton Secretary of State. She was quoted around that time saying, we have a lot of damage to repair, and she was referring to alliances frayed by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Clinton oversaw the State Department through the Arab Spring and the beginning of negotiations with Iran, which eventually became the nuclear deal known as the JCPOA. Trump abandoned that agreement in 2018 with fateful consequences. We're talking on a day where the United States and Iran seem to have signed an agreement to end, at least for now, this war. Did the United States lose this war?
Hillary Clinton
Yes. Yes. The United States has come out weaker. Iran has come out stronger. It's not even an agreement. It's a memorandum of understanding, which we haven't even seen the details of now. I started the negotiations that led to the jcpoa, the agreement that President Obama eventually signed. It was an intensive diplomatic effort. We started by getting the UN Security Council to impose sanctions, global sanctions on Iran, in June of 2010. We then worked to get secret negotiations started through Oman. And those began with several meetings and with a plan about going forward, which I handed off to my successor, John Kerry. But these were serious negotiations with high level people. So when we sat across a table from Iranians, we had our own nuclear physicists there, as did they. We had experienced diplomats, people who had negotiated on many different fronts for many years. That's not the way this administration does its business.
David Remnick
You know, the United States doesn't send bombers to Iran because anybody else commands it to. But it's very clear that Bibi Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, pushed and pushed Donald Trump to do this. It's my understanding that when you were Secretary of State, Bibi Netanyahu made the same case. Tell me about that.
Hillary Clinton
Well, you're absolutely right. When I was secretary, it was a constant theme by Netanyahu and his then government, the then Defense Minister, Ehud Barak, the former Prime Minister. It was relentless. It was a constant push. You know, I remember.
David Remnick
What would he say to you?
Hillary Clinton
What?
David Remnick
What would he say to you?
Hillary Clinton
He would basically say, you need to support us in attacking Iran. And so there was a constant argument that we would have. And, you know, I remember one day I was on the phone for hours with Ehud, with, with others, and they would say things like, our planes are on the tarmac. And I'd say, well, good luck. I mean, great. Why are you doing this?
David Remnick
You're saying you were being played all
Hillary Clinton
the time, all the time by an
David Remnick
ally that receives an enormous amount of aid.
Hillary Clinton
Well, of course. And look, Beebe's been obsessed as long as I've dealt with him with two things. Iran, as you know, and his desire to normalize relations with Saudi Arabia. The first formal meeting I had with him in 2009, probably March at the State Department. It was absolutely, you know, how can we get normalization with Saudi Arabia and how do we totally decapitate Iran? And he had this view that I think has become very clear in his dealings with Trump. Number one, decapitate the regime. It will fall. Number two, disable the military insofar as possible, the people will rise up. And that was just never our read about what was going to happen, in part because this is a ruthless, theocratic regime that at least at the top levels, the clerical level, has a kind of apocalyptic view of their own importance in the struggle against Israel, the United States, the West, their Sunni neighbors, you know, the whole map that they look at. And they are also a regime that learned, sadly, a lesson from the overthrow of the Shah. There's a lot of, you know, analysis about why the Shah was finally deposed. But one of the arguments is at the end, he would not murder his people. He would not order the mass murder of the demonstrators in the street. This regime has no such compunction. So if you have a regime that has already proven, as it did last year, they were willing to kill 35,40,000 Iranians over the protests that were going on, if you have this alliance between the clerics and the military, they have enough folks in their ranks to keep moving up and taking over. Our take on Iran was absent an effective armed opposition, which we've never seen, and absent some kind of internal dissent, whether, like a general who would say, I'm not going to tolerate, you know, this any longer, but this regime is not, you know, they're not going to be toppled by appeals to their humanity, to their better, the angels of their better nature.
David Remnick
So if I hear what you're saying correctly is, number one, Bibi Netanyahu bamboozled Donald Trump, and number two, I don't imagine the intelligence changed radically about the state of play in Iran, that the president ignored not only the advice of his vice president and Secretary of state, but the intelligence community. Telling him on the ground this would be a terrible idea.
Hillary Clinton
Well, I can't speak to that. I don't know what was presented to him. You know, I also think coming off the attacks of last June, which I supported, I supported the very specific surgical attacks on the known nuclear weapons sites. I believed that that was a clear mission with very achievable goals. I didn't know whether you could eliminate the program, but I thought you could certainly set it back.
David Remnick
Let's stay in the same region for a moment. I know that you're for a two state solution and see it as the only outcome that, that any kind of peace can exist. But if I look at the Israeli polity, they don't want a two state solution, certainly not now. And if you look at the Palestinian polity, which is even more complicated set of geographies and population, two state solution is not anywhere near the offing there. A two state solution which was fought for so hard but began going out the window many years ago, seems impossible. Am I wrong?
Hillary Clinton
You might be, but you might not be. And here's why. I'm going to say something positive about Trump. So hold on.
David Remnick
Okay, I've got a grip on my chair right now.
Hillary Clinton
Trump's 20 point plan for Gaza is actually a pathway to security for Israel, reconstruction for Gaza and the possibility of self determination, however defined for the Palestinians. There are a lot of people who reject it because Trump did it. But it's the only game in town. There's nothing else. And I've engaged in some kind of track two diplomacy with Israelis, not in the current government, former governments, military intelligence, political officials, Palestinians, Arabs. And so it's a very, you know, it's a very painful discussion because, you know, these are experienced people with lots of scars to show for their efforts over many years, not just on peace, but on security, particularly for Israel. But I really believe if we took this 20 point plan, which starts with the disarmament of Hamas, a huge important step yet to be accomplished, but took all of the 20 points, so that it wasn't just disarm Hamas and maybe do some reconstruction and build some resorts on the coast. But if you really took the whole approach that is embodied in that 20 point plan, and I know there are people who are working to try to move forward on that, there is a glimmer of a possible path forward. Now, having said that, you are dealing with two peoples that are even more traumatized than perhaps has happened in the past. You had Rachel Goldberg Poland on your podcast last week. And you know, I met her during the time when I was trying to help and support families who were advocating to get the hostages back. And it's, you know, she writes this very moving, profoundly sad book about her son Hersh.
David Remnick
And we've had Mohammad Mahweesh and Mossad Al Btoh, who lost multiple members of their family.
Hillary Clinton
And I've met with them as well.
David Remnick
And, and 7. Did the Biden administration fail to push hard against the Netanyahu government? Government. Did it give too free a reign to the Israeli government during the war?
Hillary Clinton
You know, I think it's a very Very hard question to answer. For this reason, As I said, October 7th was a mass trauma event. Clearly, the people who were murdered, the families who lost loved ones, the hostages, 250 plus who were taken into Gaza, it was a long, terrible trauma, 100%.
David Remnick
But Biden came to Israel, and the wisest thing it seems to me that he said was, I feel your pain. I understand how horrible this is. We support you, but at the same time, do not repeat our mistakes and act out of prolonged vengeance. He was obviously referring to Afghanistan and even more so to Iraq. The misadventures there, to say the least, and the damage they did and the lives lost there. And I think a lot of people would say that is exactly what Israel went ahead and did by such a prolonged war. And that the United States and the Biden administration, and later the Trump administration did very little to put a. Put a pause to it.
Hillary Clinton
You know, I think that. And again, I wasn't there. I don't know what the internal discussions were, but every time there was a push against Israel to change tactics to avoid certain targets, you know, the response would be, we know that there are tunnels. Could and should the Israelis have been more careful with civilian casualties? Absolutely. There's no doubt about that. But did they have a response to what they were trying to accomplish? Rescuing hostages, getting access to Hamas leadership and fighters in these tunnels? They did. And trying to walk that line in the middle of a war is very hard. So I try to imagine myself, I'm sitting in CENTCOM and talking to the Israeli military. I'm sitting at the CIA and talking to Mossad. And they are coming back, not with totally unbelievable claims. They're coming back with, here's what our intelligence tells us. We think if we can get there, get there, maybe we can get Sinwar, maybe we can rescue hostages. And the fog of war was like, totally overwhelming.
David Remnick
When you hear Ehud Olmert refer to war crimes, when you hear a scholar like an Israeli scholar, like Omer Bartov refer to genocide, or even David Grossman, a novelist, you know. Well, do you agree with them?
Hillary Clinton
Again, I am looking at facts I'm trying to figure out, and I have not reached my own conclusions because I don't have an. You know, oftentimes there's after action reports. And the thing I am most critical of is there has been no after action report about what happened leading up to October 7th, on October 7th, and post October 7th. So we don't have all the information. I personally would like to see and know about the original Sin is, why did October 7 happen? What were the signals that were missed? What could have been done differently? What did Bibi Netanyahu think he was doing? Having Qatar pay Hamas millions and millions of dollars a month in order, in his thinking, to weaken the Palestinian Authority? What did he think was going to happen? So I guess my point, David, is I want to know everything I can know. I want to know everything I can about the intelligence failures, the military decisions before. I'm willing to say you could have done this or you should have done that or pass judgment.
David Remnick
I received a text today. I received a text today from the best journalist I know in Israel, a very keen defense analyst. And he said, this memo of understanding is the end of the. I think a lot of people have gone broke predicting the political end of Bibi Netanyahu. Are you willing to go broke?
Hillary Clinton
You know, he has certainly more than nine lives politically, but I think this is a real defeat for him. He did push Trump into the war against Iran. We didn't gain anything of real importance, and we may have lost a lot. But that means Bibi also lost. Because to go into that kind of alliance and to push Trump to do something that Trump I'm not sure even understood the implications of, and then for Trump wanting to get out of it because what did he say a few weeks ago? I'm bored. This is boring. Trying to make peace is boring. So Beebe's left out there by himself, and there are several really serious questions. You know, what he's doing in Lebanon now is, to me, counterproductive. He has never had Israel, has never had, in as long as I can remember, a government that started out more open to working with Israel to try to disarm Hezbollah. And rather than trying to be, you know, in my view, kind of smart about how to build up a Lebanese government for the purpose of disarming and neutering Hezbollah, which is definitely in Israel's interest. Israel has been engaged in this bombardment of Lebanon, and, you know, so they're fighting on that front. I think they're turning a blind eye to the settler violence in the west bank is extremely dangerous. So I think, you know, Netanyahu believes that war is his friend because he wants to contain the opposition by creating conflict so that he tries to rally the country behind him. I think this Iran deal may be the straw that finally breaks that and creates an opening for his departure in the upcoming elections. But I'm worried that if you don't see a government that understands the importance of tending to Israel's economy and future. You're going to see a big exit by particularly young Israelis, and there is some evidence of that.
David Remnick
My conversation with Hillary Clinton continues in just a moment. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.
Hillary Clinton
WNYC Studios is supported by decagon.
Sponsor Announcer
The best customer experiences happen when customers feel like they're the only one. Almost like they have their own concierge. But once more and more requests start to come in, a lot of companies turn to AI and lose that personal touch. Decagon helps companies create personalized concierge style customer experiences with AI agents across chat, email, voice and SMS. They're available 24, 7, feel natural to talk to, and can resolve customer requests on their own so businesses can keep up with requests without losing their personal touch. Decagon plugs directly into your existing systems so agents can get live quickly. And because workflows can be updated using natural language, teams can make changes themselves without long engineering cycles. They give your team full visibility into why agents make decisions and what's happening across every conversation so it's easier to spot trends and improve the experience over time. Decagon helps power millions of conversations every day, ready to transform your customer support? Go to Decagon AI New Yorker to get a personalized demo and see what Decagon can do for your team. Check decagon out at Decagon AI New Yorker. That's Decagon AI New Yorker.
The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort, offering destination focused small ship experiences on all seven continents with a shore excursion included in every port, and programs designed for cultural enrichment. And every Viking voyage is all inclusive with no children and no casinos. Learn more@viking.com
David Remnick
this is Ira Glass on this American Life. One thing we like is a good mystery sometimes about really big things, things you hear in the news. But most times the little mysteries are the best. Our lost and found is currently filled with pants.
Sponsor Announcer
I don't know.
David Remnick
I've never seen this happen. I've got skirts. I've got shorts.
Lisa
Is this true?
David Remnick
This is true. Mysteries of every Size. Each week, this American Life. Wherever you get your podcasts, This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. Welcome back. I've been speaking today with Hillary Rodham Clinton. She's a former Senator and Secretary of State, and she's the author of a number of books, including the most recent Something Lost, Something Gained. I'll conclude my conversation now with Hillary Clinton. A few weeks ago, the Democratic National Committee released an autopsy report on the 2024 election, it satisfied nobody. Not one person did it satisfy, except for maybe the Bidens, because it didn't mention Joe Biden's decision to run. But when you look back on his decision to run, did he make a terrible mistake?
Hillary Clinton
He made a terrible mistake. He made a terrible mistake for himself, his legacy, and for the country. He had said that he would not run again. And, you know, counterfactual narratives are always a bit tricky. But I believe if he had kept to that plan and said that he wasn't going to run, that he was going to pass the torch to the next generation, we would have had a real contest. And very sadly, I believe whoever emerged from that contest, whether it was the vice president or a governor or a senator or anybody else, would have beaten Donald Trump. So I think it was a terrible miscalculation on the part of President Biden. But once he held on for as long as he did, we were in a terrible dilemma.
David Remnick
Why didn't anybody say so? You're a powerful figure still, a powerful voice. And the Democratic Party, there are a lot of people that are powerful. Not a lot. A select group of people with powerful voices, whether Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, et cetera, et cetera. Nobody said this. Why was it so difficult to speak about this?
Hillary Clinton
I think there were a lot of conversations going on behind the scenes. I certainly am aware of that, participated in a number of them. But there was no way to convince him by going public. And eventually what convinced him was, you know, a debate. Polling. Polling information.
David Remnick
But after a horrendous public disaster. Well, but were there private discussions? Were there people on your level of your eminence that went to Joe Biden and said, look, Joe, we love you, but it's time. You're not the guy you were 15 years ago. Enough already.
Hillary Clinton
I know of a few people who tried that, and they were met with total denial, and not just from him, but from the people around him, Joe Biden in particular. Before the debate, before what happened at the debate, there was a belief, and it was strongly held inside the White House that he would win again. After the debate, I think they were in a state of sort of disbelief about what happened and kept trying to explain it, rationalize it, justify it. And there were a lot of people who publicly and privately then said, you know, that's not recoverable. Initially, that was denied, but, you know, look, it happened, it's over, it's behind us. I don't think it's useful to keep beating that horse.
David Remnick
One other retrospective question no.
Sponsor Announcer
Okay.
Hillary Clinton
Beat one more horse. Okay.
David Remnick
No, different horse.
Hillary Clinton
It's a donkey.
David Remnick
I know that joke. It's a good joke. And you come to the why? They all know the joke. Did Kamala Harris lose solely because she only had 100 days to run?
Hillary Clinton
I think that was definitely a factor. I think she also found herself really in a difficult position trying to run as the sitting vice president, but separate herself from the sitting president. There was no gap between her service, as there was with mine, and her campaign. So I think that was a real problem.
David Remnick
And then there's the other thing. I can't tell you how many people, people on the left, people who consider themselves good feminists, enlightened about identity in all senses, will say to me next time in 28, we cannot take the risk. We can't be a woman. It can't be African American, et cetera, et cetera. And I find this shocking. It is now we're a quarter of the way through the 21st century and we're still having this conversation. Is you. You've lifted the microphone and you're ready to go. I don't need to continue.
Hillary Clinton
Well, first of all, there is a global pushback on women's rights, and part of that is being led by this administration. The first person that Trump fired was the woman commandant of the Coast Guard. The second person was the black combat veteran Air Force general who was the chair of the Joint Chiefs. And the third person was the first woman to be chief of naval operations. And we've seen what just happened last week with Hegseth removing women and black military officers from promotion. We've seen them taking down pictures of the first woman who flew with the Thunderbird, you know, formation. The first, the black general, Chaffee James, who was an incredibly effective fighter pilot. There is an unabashed campaign to undermine both minority leadership and women's leadership in public spaces. There's no doubt about that. And not only is it happening in so called IRL real life, it's happening online to just an extraordinary extent where the threats against women, the attacks on women. So this is a moment where we are seeing the firing of women, not men. I mean, for heaven's sakes, I'm not going to make any brief for the women that he fired from his cabinet. I didn't agree with any of them, but Hegseth is still there. And so you think about the way that this man is treating women, the way he talks to women journalists. His whole behavior toward women is so disdainful. So I think that's in the culture, it's not made up when people say, well, I don't know. I don't know if we could vote for a black candidate or a woman candidate. But my ultimate answer to that is, it depends upon the candidate.
David Remnick
Well, let me ask you about one. The candidate that's polling now the highest among women certainly is Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. How would you feel about her as a standard bearer for the Democratic Party nationally?
Hillary Clinton
Well, those are not the same polls that I've seen. I think, look, she is a very talented politician, and she is, like in the top five, but so is Kamala Harris. And depending upon the poll, sometimes Gavin Newsom. I mean, so it's a. I mean,
David Remnick
among women, I'm talking. Gavin Newsom is not that.
Hillary Clinton
I'm talking about what I consider to be reliable polls of voter sentiment, which is both men and women, because you're not going to win with just women. I wish that would be someday possible, but not so. I don't know. It's way too soon. But here's what I really think. Number one, stay focused on the midterm elections. We have to win the House and hopefully the Senate.
Sponsor Announcer
Okay.
Hillary Clinton
And we have some really good chances of doing that in the House. And I think we have a 50, 50 chance, you know, in the Senate.
David Remnick
To win the Senate.
Narrator/Producer
One of the.
David Remnick
One of the. One of the seats that the Democrats have to win is in Maine. How do you feel about him?
Hillary Clinton
I feel about him the way I feel about any candidate. I want to see what kind of candidate he actually turns out to be. The bumps on the road that he has experienced and some of the things he has said.
David Remnick
Bumps on the road?
Hillary Clinton
Yeah, I mean, clearly bumps on the road in terms of some of his prior behavior, some of his prior statements. And I will tell you, I serve with Susan Collins. She is going to be very hard to beat, and it's going to be a tough election. So I'm reserving.
David Remnick
But if you were a Mainer, would you pull the. Where would you pull the lever?
Hillary Clinton
But I'm not a Mainer. I'm a New Yorker. No, but seriously, I mean, you're gonna
David Remnick
let that pitch go by?
Hillary Clinton
But, David, look, I think this election has to be about affordability and accountability, and we need to start holding the people around Trump accountable. And we're going to see whether we can, you know, take the Senate, but I think the House has to be the primary objective. And then once that election is behind us, you're going to have 10 or 12 pretty good candidates, in my view, running in 2028. And I, you know, I. I don't know who's going to emerge because I don't know who's going to catch the moment. I don't know who's going to be able to convince the various factions of the Democratic Party to support him or her. But I wouldn't rule out any woman who wants to run or any African American or any Latino or anybody else. If they want to get into the arena, get in the arena, show us what you can do, and see whether people will vote for you.
David Remnick
Do you think the Democratic Party has an elites problem?
Hillary Clinton
No, I think some people believe it does. And that, I think is somewhat amusing because our elites are not stealing money from the treasury to pay off the insurrectionists who attack the Capitol. And our elites are not going around the world making business deals for their children, at least so far as I know. And so when people say that, you know, they're really saying, well, you know, you guys, you're in blue cities and blue states and you don't relate to us. And so I think that's the problem. I think it's more of a political identification problem. So you just have to take what people say about your candidates and be ready to fight back. That's a false equivalence.
David Remnick
A lot of time I lived in Moscow for four years during the collapse of the Soviet Union and then thereafter, and I would often think to myself, what would it be like to actually live in a society like this, where I loathe my government, and would I be someone who, in order to keep my family together or to preserve my bank account, would I collaborate? And I have to say, I hope not with a minimum of righteousness. It has shocked me, shocked me to see the level of acquiescence in our society among elites who have turned on a dime, on a dime in order to preserve their immense fortunes and to make them greater?
Hillary Clinton
Well, I'm afraid you're right in terms of the acquiescence. So for some people, it's simply staying in power, being able to feel like they are important. But the people who are in positions of great economic power, like the tech companies and other large businesses, have been so disappointing in the way that they have basically aligned themselves with Trump, Trump policies, and in large measure, I guess, because they think, quote, it's good for their business. But what they're not appreciating is that this kind of unchecked, unaccountable power can turn and bite them just as easily. You saw it. You saw it in Russia, you saw the transition from the collapse of the Soviet Union and you saw the oligarchs being formed, the privatization. But then when Putin came along, it was, I want 5%. No, I now want 25%. I want 50%. And that's why people say he's the richest man in the world, because he's
David Remnick
basically, I must say, he loves you. I have never seen somebody speak so harshly of anyone as to watch Putin speaking about Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton
Well, I wear it as a badge of honor. But it did help, You know, contrary to what you hear from Donald Trump, he did help Donald Trump win, and partly because he knew what kind of leader I would be compared to Donald, whom he knew would not.
David Remnick
I want to ask you two quick questions about the law. On a scale of 1 to 10, how worried are you about being locked up?
Hillary Clinton
Well, it's not for lack of trying that I'm not that they, you know, they continue to, you know, not only go after me, but go after all kinds of, you know, people that Trump considers his, quote, enemies. I'm not worried about it. If the law matters and if the facts matter, I have nothing to worry about. And what I've been slightly reassured about in the last couple of months is the way the courts are actually enforcing their orders. So the name is off the Kennedy center, you know, $1.776 billion fund is enjoined. And so there is finally the pushback. Our big problem has been the Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court has enabled and approved so much of what he's done on the so called shadow docket. And that is what has given him the permission to go forward with a lot of the things that he has pursued without there being yet any kind of final adjudication. So when I think about the law personally, I'm not that worried for myself, but I do see him continuing to unleash his private law firm, which used to be called the Justice Department, against people and forcing them to be, you know, investigated, spend money, everything, to just put them, you know, at risk. So, yeah, I do think that he is going to continue to do that. And we unfortunately are going to have to continue to fight back.
David Remnick
Has John Roberts in particular, as chief justice failed the law?
Hillary Clinton
I voted against him as a senator, I met with him, I voted against Alito, and Alito was a much more obvious movement conservative, a results oriented judge. And so I had no doubt about what he would do and I gave a speech on the floor. John Roberts, though, as I looked into his past when he clerked for Justice Rehnquist, he wrote a memoir about reversing the Voting Rights act back in the 1980s. So he has been a known commodity to some of us who paid attention for some time. But he comes across as more affable, you know, a kind of country club person that you would have a nice dinner with. But make no mistake about it, he led the charge against the Voting Rights Act. He led the charge against campaign finance reform. He has been on the side of the, you know, sort of federalist agenda since he was a young lawyer, a young law clerk. And this is his court. And I think they have concluded, led by him, you know, the majority certainly, that their job is to turn the clock back as much as possible on the 20th century. They believe in almost the height of corporate power. They believe in the role that corporations should play in our politics and basically undisclosed, unlimited money, plus then things like the Voting Rights act, which they view as, in the way they describe it, unnecessary in a, quote, colorblind society that's gotten beyond race. I don't know where they live, I don't know who they talk to. I don't understand it. But that is their stated view. But it's really, you know, I went to law school with Clarence Thomas and he just gave a speech about, for the 250th commemoration, I think at Texas or somewhere, he gave a speech basically saying that, you know, the progressive movement had destroyed America and it needed to be reined in.
David Remnick
Secretary Clinton, thank you so much.
Hillary Clinton
Thank you, David.
David Remnick
I spoke with Hillary Rodham Clinton this past week at the 92nd Street Y in Manhattan. I'm David Remnick. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. Now for all the history buffs out there, we've got a treat in store. Next week we'll be joined by the hosts of the Rest is History, a really wonderful podcast from the uk. Tom Holland and Dominic Sandbrook will talk about the Declaration of Independence. But as as soon seen by the Brits and they suggest that the whole revolution business that we are going to celebrate wasn't really that big a deal or not as big a deal as we think it was. Talk about chutzpah. I hope you'll join us.
Narrator/Producer
The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co production of WNYC and the New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards with additional music by Louis Mitchell. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul and Ursula Sommer, with guidance from Emily Botine. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherina Endowment Fund.
Sponsor Announcer
For a small business owner, every day is full of surprises. Some great, some not so great, like when a client cancels their order at the last minute. But here's a surprise you will like. Progressive provides small business owners with 30 customizable coverage options to help keep their business going strong. So go ahead, surprise yourself. Get a quote in as little as 8 minutes@progressivecommercial.com Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates and third party insurers. Coverage is not available in all states or for all vehicles and coverage selections
Hillary Clinton
on Big Lives we take a single
David Remnick
cultural icon, people like Jane Fonda, George Michael, Little Richard, and we pull apart the story behind the image. And we do this by digging through the BBC's vast archives, discovering forgotten interviews that change exactly how we see these
Hillary Clinton
giants of our culture.
David Remnick
We're here for the messy, the brilliant, the human version of our heroes. I'm Emmanuel Jochi. I'm Kai Wright. And this It's Big Lives. Listen to Big Lives wherever you get your podcasts.
Episode: Hillary Clinton on How Donald Trump Lost the Iran War
Date: June 18, 2026
Host: David Remnick
Guest: Hillary Rodham Clinton
In this wide-ranging conversation, David Remnick speaks with former Secretary of State and 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton at the 92nd Street Y in New York. They discuss the fallout from the war in Iran, Donald Trump’s foreign policy miscalculations, the trajectory of Trumpism and authoritarianism in America, the prospects and pitfalls facing the Democratic Party, and the challenges of achieving peace in the Middle East. Clinton also offers candid reflections on President Biden’s ill-fated 2024 reelection campaign, the legacy of Kamala Harris’s subsequent bid, and the state of women and minority leadership in U.S. politics.
[03:07]–[06:51]
Authoritarian Threats: Clinton identifies Trump and his enablers as existential threats to American democracy:
“I really believe that he does represent the threat of authoritarianism... his kind of performance, politics, his deliberate cruelty, is exactly what they want to see for the country.” (Clinton, 05:03)
Psychology of Loss: Drawing from her Columbia University class, Clinton explains how people in a “domain of loss” often double down on risky behaviors—linking this to Trump’s escalating impulsiveness:
“When people feel they are losing, they very frequently take greater risks. They double down on their behavior. And that's what I'm now worried about... he's demanding that we accept his version of reality, which is unhinged.” (Clinton, 05:34)
[06:51]–[11:10]
‘Deplorables’ Remarks: Clinton clarifies her infamous characterization of Trump’s supporters and the early signs of the “alt right”:
“[Alt right]... was beginning to see this really disturbing rhetoric, racist rhetoric, sexist rhetoric, you know, the kind of authoritarian, demagogic claims... Most of the people... they want change. They are not satisfied with where we are in the country.” (Clinton, 07:23)
Dynastic Ambitions: The discussion speculates on potential Trump family succession, with Clinton suggesting Trump trusts only his blood relatives:
“Given Trump’s psychology… he definitely, if he can't do it himself, he wants somebody he can control and preferably somebody related to him.” (Clinton, 10:51)
Trump’s Condition: Remnick asks if Trump is “disintegrating”; Clinton points to Trump's poor health, impulsivity, and lack of curiosity, especially regarding foreign affairs:
“He’s falling asleep all the time... he stays up all night posting... He doesn’t even try to hide [his traits].” (Clinton, 11:23)
[17:02]–[24:41]
U.S. Defeat: On the newly announced memorandum of understanding (rather than a full treaty) to end the war, Clinton is blunt:
“Yes. Yes. The United States has come out weaker. Iran has come out stronger. It's not even an agreement. It's a memorandum of understanding, which we haven't seen the details of.” (Clinton, 18:01)
The JCPOA and Diplomatic Process: Clinton describes the painstaking diplomacy that led to the original Iran nuclear agreement, contrasting it with the Trump administration’s approach.
Netanyahu’s Influence: Clinton affirms Netanyahu relentlessly pushed both her and Trump to strike Iran:
“He would basically say, you need to support us in attacking Iran... our planes are on the tarmac. I'd say, well, good luck.” (Clinton, 20:06)
Iran’s Regime Hardness: Lessons from Iran's repression show why regime change is unrealistic:
“This regime has no... compunction. If you have a regime that has already proven... willing to kill 35, 40,000 Iranians over the protests... they are not going to be toppled by appeals to their humanity.” (Clinton, 21:44)
Netanyahu and Trump: Clinton suggests Netanyahu “bamboozled” Trump into the Iran war and that Trump ignored intelligence and advice.
[24:41]–[32:46]
Two-State Solution: Clinton remains a supporter but admits prospects are bleak:
“A two-state solution... began going out the window many years ago, seems impossible. Am I wrong?” (Remnick, 25:25)
“You might be, but you might not be.” (Clinton, 25:25)
Unexpected Praise for Trump: Clinton praises Trump’s “20-point plan for Gaza” as the “only game in town” for a path toward security and reconstruction, if fully implemented:
“If you really took the whole approach... there is a glimmer of a possible path forward.” (Clinton, 25:41)
October 7th & Accountability: Clinton highlights the lack of an after-action report about the Hamas attack and Israel’s response, critiquing both intelligence and military judgments.
[32:46]–[35:50]
Netanyahu’s Fate: Clinton predicts the Iran war outcome is a major defeat for Netanyahu, who may finally be ousted due to loss of credibility and a series of miscalculations.
Regional Dangers: She notes Israel’s ongoing conflicts (especially with Lebanon), unchecked settler violence, and the risk of losing young Israelis to emigration.
[37:49]–[43:28]
Biden’s 2024 Decision: Clinton is unequivocal:
“He made a terrible mistake. He made a terrible mistake for himself, his legacy, and for the country... I believe whoever emerged [had Biden not run]... would have beaten Donald Trump.” (Clinton, 38:59)
Why No Intervention: Clinton explains behind-the-scenes discussions to urge Biden’s retirement, but notes public intervention wouldn’t have changed his mind:
“There was no way to convince him by going public. And eventually what convinced him was... polling information... after a horrendous public disaster.” (Clinton, 40:15)
Kamala Harris’s Loss: Kamala Harris’s campaign was hamstrung by her association with Biden and a short time frame:
“She also found herself really in a difficult position trying to run as the sitting vice president, but separate herself from the sitting president.” (Clinton, 42:14)
Barriers for Women and Minorities: Clinton addresses ongoing bias and coordinated efforts to undermine women and minority leaders, from the Trump administration to the military:
“There is an unabashed campaign to undermine both minority leadership and women's leadership in public spaces. There's no doubt about that.” (Clinton, 43:28)
[45:41]–[48:45]
Women Candidates: Clinton refuses to rule out anyone for 2028, emphasizing the need to “get in the arena.”
Democratic ‘Elites’ Critique: She rejects claims of an “elites problem,” calling comparisons between Democratic and MAGA elites “amusing” and “false equivalence.”
[49:40]–[51:41]
[51:41]–[56:48]
Personal Risks: On threats of prosecution, Clinton is confident in her legal standing, but deeply concerned about the Justice Department being used as “Trump's private law firm.”
Supreme Court’s Rightward Shift: Clinton sharply critiques Roberts and the Court’s project of rolling back rights:
“This is his court. And I think they have concluded... that their job is to turn the clock back as much as possible on the 20th century.” (Clinton, 54:19)
“If he tries to stay, I'm running again.”
(Clinton quoting her husband, on Trump’s succession ambitions, 09:33)
“Where is the Strait of Hormuz? You know, you can't make it up. It's like some movie that you walk out of because it's so outlandish.”
(Clinton, on Trump’s foreign policy ignorance, 12:36)
“Trump's 20 point plan for Gaza is actually a pathway to security for Israel, reconstruction for Gaza and the possibility of self determination... it's the only game in town.”
(Clinton, 25:41)
“He did push Trump into the war against Iran. We didn't gain anything of real importance, and we may have lost a lot.”
(Clinton, on Netanyahu, 33:12)
“He made a terrible mistake for himself, his legacy, and for the country.”
(Clinton, on Biden running in 2024, 38:59)
“There is an unabashed campaign to undermine both minority leadership and women's leadership in public spaces. There's no doubt about that.”
(Clinton, 43:28)
“If they want to get into the arena, get in the arena, show us what you can do, and see whether people will vote for you.”
(Clinton, 48:40)
“Our elites are not stealing money from the treasury to pay off the insurrectionists who attack the Capitol... That's a false equivalence.”
(Clinton, 48:50)
“He loves you. I have never seen somebody speak so harshly of anyone as to watch Putin speaking about Hillary Clinton.”
*(Remnick, on Putin, 51:41)
“Well, I wear it as a badge of honor.”**
(Clinton, 51:51)
“This is his court. And I think they have concluded... their job is to turn the clock back as much as possible on the 20th century.”
(Clinton, on the Roberts Court, 54:19)
Clinton is candid, direct, and critical, employing both narrative reflection and policy specifics. Remnick presses for introspection and systemic diagnosis, while injecting occasional wit. The conversation maintains a largely serious, pragmatic, and at times urgent tone—particularly regarding democratic backsliding and authoritarian threats.
This episode offers a deeply informed and forthright conversation with Hillary Clinton on Trumpism, the consequences of U.S. foreign policy missteps in Iran, the profound challenges facing the Democratic Party, and the enduring barriers for women and minority leaders at the highest levels of American politics. Clinton’s assessments—whether of Biden’s campaign strategy, Netanyahu’s calculations, or Trump’s psychological decline—are firmly stated and rooted in her decades of experience at the pinnacle of U.S. politics and diplomacy. Throughout, she remains wary but cautiously optimistic about American democracy’s capacity to recover and renew.