
Loading summary
Narrator/Announcer
America is an aspirational idea, one we're still working to fulfill. It was shaped by Enlightenment ideals, reason, liberty and freedom of conscience, the belief that power comes from we the people, not a divinely appointed ruler. And while these ideals have not yet been fully perfected, they created something powerful, a framework that has expanded rights and freedoms over time. Now those freedoms and your rights are under attack. We're seeing growing efforts to blur the line between church and state, using public funds, funds to promote religion, putting Ten Commandments into classrooms, and pushing a version of America that leaves out too many people. As our Nation approaches its 250th anniversary, the Freedom From Religion foundation is working to protect the Constitution, defend secular government, and ensure that freedom continues to expand for everyone. Because America isn't just where we started, it's what we choose next. Go to FFRF, US State or text State to 5 11, 511 text State to 5 11, 511 text. Fees may apply.
Jon Stewart
Folks, I have no problem giving a platform to to those delightful companies that we have scrutinized from top to bottom and picked only the best. But here's the thing. I am first and foremost, we are. We are a communicator. We are, we are a show. And as such, you know, we don't necessarily give big ups to other shows. But I'm going to. I promised myself I wouldn't cry. I'm going to make an exception in this case for npr, npr, National Public Radio, and their up first podcast. I don't know if you've seen the up first podcast on npr. It gives you the three biggest news stories of the day and reporting and analysis to actually understand them. That's why you go to NPR, to actually understand things. And they do it in 15 minutes in the amount of time it takes me to eat an entire pizza. That's right. That's another little piece of information you probably didn't know. I can eat the entire pizza in under 15 minutes while I'm listening to the up first podcast. Follow NPR's Up first podcast so you can understand what matters and what happens next. It's hard news through a human lens. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the weekly show podcast with John Stewart. It is Tuesday, June 16th, year of our Knicks 2026. Oh, I don't know if you hear in my voice in any way. It's a little something called life, a little something called hope. A I. You know what? Here's I'm going to say something before we get into the show. The Mets can suck all year. I don't give a. Do what you want. Coming last, have a payroll of $500 million. I really don't give a. It doesn't matter. You know what? You've been granted amnesty. You have, you have a waiver. All my other teams, you have a waiver. The 53 year drought. Boy, did we have. I know you're sick of hearing about it, probably, but 7th Avenue, 10th street, my wife, my son, Robert Smal, one of his sons. We stood there in the heat, staring at the side of a building, projecting the game. It was just one of the most wonderful experiences of my sporting life to just be in the city and feel the hopes and fears and ups and downs and adrenaline and negativity followed by just an absolute explosion of joy. And I have to give one. Along with like nypd, nyfd, sanitation department, the people who projected them. There was one dude, two guys actually, MVPs of our, of the, the 7th Avenue watch party. They had an igloo cooler. And in that cooler was the most delightful mix of snacks and drinks. I don't know where these angels came from. They had uncrustables, they had those little blue bell cheese pucks that you unwrap. Margaritas, beers, water. And just every now and again they would dip into it and somebody would like poke you on the shoulder and go, cheese. He would cheese you during the game. It was the most incredible. And for some reason, and he showed this early, he had a Ziploc bag, a pretty good sized Ziploc bag filled with 12 hard boiled eggs. Now, I don't know if that was his Seder supply that he's preparing for next year or if he's got an egg salad thing called. But he just, with all these delightful snacks and beverages, he had this thing of. And I just thought what a ridiculous, ridiculous thing to actually consider to bring to this tailgate party in the middle of, of New York City. But I'm telling you, three quarters of the way through the fourth quarter, when the tension got the highest, he broke out this bag of eggs. And people in the crowd responded to them like he was passing out free Knicks T shirts from a T shirt gun. Egg me. Egg me. He would throw the egg, people would catch them on a scoop on the stoop and eat them. It was the most brilliant, it was the coup de GR of his entire refreshment regime that he had brought out there. And so, sir, sirs, I salute you, you anonymous heroes. Beautiful. It was just a, it was a beautiful moment. And that is how I will commemorate that day, but. But it paled in comparison to, you know, obviously, martial arts fighting on the lawn of the White House to celebrate the 250th. So I thought, why not? For this show today, let's talk about the nation's 250th birthday and why this has all become so controversial as to who owns our history, who doesn't own our history, what is our real history? And so who better to do that? And, you know, these are always my favorite episodes. Historians, I just love historians. They've done the work, and all we get to do is ask them the stories and they have them at their beck and call. And so we're going to get them. These are two of the best, two of the best historians out there. Ladies and gentlemen, as we move into the celebration of our nation's 250th year, we are honored to have with us today two just widely revered experts in the study of the history of this great country, Mr. David Blight Sterling professor of history at Yale University, and Professor Annette Gordon Reed, Carl M. Loeb, University professor at Harvard University. So it's this. The entire conversation is a Yale, Harvard off. I want to ask you, David, I'll start with you.
Brittany Mamedovic
You.
Jon Stewart
You know, perhaps nothing embodies sort of the absurdity of the moment that we're having right now in that our 250th celebration, we have two competing visions of it, even within our own government. We have the America 250 celebration, which is a, I guess a bipartisan group nonprofit established 10 years ago through Congress to come up with events. And suddenly we have the Freedom 250, which was formed by the Trump administration for their vision. What does that say in your mind, professor, about the moment that we are in?
David Blight
Well, it's just one more measure of how divided or polarized we are. One of those efforts is, I think, at least an attempt at real history that is some complexity, some nuance, some ambiguity, the conflicts as well as the triumphs. The other one is propaganda. The other one is using history in the service of a political moment. It's history in the service of the present. And it's a very partisan effort. It isn't just being done by the White House, though, of course, the White House has had many, many enablers here, not least of which is the Heritage foundation and other think tanks. In fact, the Heritage foundation has basically become the White House's history department. So those two visions, if you like, are two different ways to do history.
Jon Stewart
Both are very old yes, propaganda. Not a new form.
David Blight
No, not a new thing. Not a new thing.
Jon Stewart
Annette? What? You know, it brings up the interesting point. What. What is the importance of a nation's origin story? And. And why do ideologues or partisans work so hard to control it?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Well, I think we look to origin stories in the same way we look to our own origin stories. We say, where were you born? Where did you grow up? You meet somebody and you say, where are you from? If you say, I'm from Texas, that tells people they think, rightly or wrongly, a lot about me. If you're from Brooklyn, it tells you about you. So I think we take ourselves and we look at the nation and we sort of meld them together and say, how did this country get started? Because it's gonna tell us something fundamental about who we are, and we've always done this. And your first question about the polarization. I mean, history is inherently political because there's a battle about how people are supposed to think about themselves. So one person will tell an origin story that they think is all uplift and not truthful. And I think that that's one of what David is getting at there, because it's something that makes you feel good in the present. And at the same time, you can. On the other hand, you could say, well, I want a truthful story. I really want to know what happened in the past so that I can have a much more nuanced, as you said, story new, a more realistic story. Now, what I face is that I write about slavery and I write about Jefferson and very difficult topics. There are people who don't want a truthful story about all of that. They want something that's a feel good, and sometimes it makes you feel good and sometimes it doesn't. But you have to have both of those things to have the kind of complexity that makes real history.
Jon Stewart
David, what is the damage of a truthful story? Why is that? So resist it. I mean, and that brings up a good point. And there's something in there also about people lie to themselves as well. It's not just about, you know. So I imagine for a historian, that's even a very difficult thing to tease out that you can read. You know, the difference between sort of journalism being the first draft of history and history and how you tease out. Are these people lying to themselves? Are they lionizing themselves? But why? Why would that be so resisted?
David Blight
Well, because narratives are always in conflict. And when a powerful historical narrative, series of stories, exhibitions in museums, great historic sites, get somewhat reinterpreted it can disorient people. It can dislodge them from the pleasing, pleasurable, familiar narrative. You know, most human beings, let's face it, we're all a little bit part of this, want to live in a kind of chosen narrative. We'd all like our great, our grandparents to be heroes. Our great grandparents. We can really make heroes if we didn't know them. You know, we always, everyone's always looking for the perfect ancestor as long as they don't know too much about them. And, well, you know, I mean, we. That's the man, and that's what your origins. I'm ready, man.
Jon Stewart
Yeah.
David Blight
No, origin stories are, are self made. Who are we? Well, let us tell you. And also, I mean, origin stories are tricky. We can't live without them. Every culture does it, every church does it, every institution does it, every country does it. Always has. But they're tricky. Mark Bloch, the great French historian killed in the Holocaust, Warren, he had a little piece of an essay he entitled the Idol of Origins. And he said, well, beware, as soon as you find your origins, well, then that origin has a origin, and then that origin has an origin. And watch out, you don't really fully know the origin unless you look deeper, deeper, deeper. So the trouble with history is that it can, it can dislodge us from the comforting story we'd like to be living. And that's part of what's happened here in the last, let's say, two decades, really. It predates Trump, where the American right has become so concerned about some of the great changes in how we've interpreted narrated American history, everything from race to gender and many other issues has gotten them all worked up. Because there was a comfortable narrative of this country, there always has been. And it got quite dislodged. Not because, as a Trump executive order said, we were trying to tell everybody nothing but shame about America. That's nonsense. That's not what we do. Just because we've, we've learned how to tell the complexities of history. And it turns out most people want that.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Oh, they definitely.
Jon Stewart
I, I would be sure of that, Annette. Is that what you've seen, that over time, you know, the fact that you're dealing with tricky issues of slavery and race and, and those kinds of issues is, that is the dividing point here, that the effort is to create an origin story of the country that's more singular and more reflective of maybe a Christian origin story or a nationalist origin story that's more homogenous, and that because you're dealing in the complexities of race or as David said, gender, things that don't fit as easily. That's where the pushback comes. And have you felt that pushback grow?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Oh, yes, definitely. I mean, the last from the revolution in the historiography of slavery, in particular in the 40s and the 50s, and ever since then, that goes along with the civil rights movement. I mean, history, we ask different questions of the past depending upon what's going on. And once we started changing laws and getting rid of segregation, all those kinds of things, and making transforming America, you go back and people start looking at history in a different way, asking different questions. And I think, as David is suggesting, this is a reaction to all of that. There are people who want to put the genie back in the bottle or want to rewind the tape and say, no, let's go back to a more comforting narrative. Mainly because perhaps they want to go back to a more comforting country. You know, a country that a sort of 1950s, 1940s country and everybody idolizes. But that's a time when people went to separate bathrooms, people women couldn't get credit cards. I mean, all these things. There's a lot that goes along with this nostalgic vision of history, and that is a nostalgic vision of the present. And so that's what's really frightening about it. It's not just about a complaint about history. It's a complaint about where we are now, the kind of country we have become in the past 50 or 60 years.
Jon Stewart
So is the idea in that that if they feel like they can control the narrative of the past, they can control the future?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Exactly. I mean, the thing is, this is who we are, and this the push for originalism. The idea we have to go back essentially to, it's always the 1789 Constitution, 1787, 1789 Constitution. It's not the post Civil War one that gives us the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendment. Let's go back to the original. And that is back in the time when, you know, black, there was a strict racial hierarchy, a gender hierarchy, and we can't do anything past what those people thought at the time. And that's, you know, that's. That's a complaint about history, but it's also a complaint about the new society that America has tried to make in the late 20th century and the early 21st century.
David Blight
John?
Jon Stewart
Yeah, David, go ahead.
David Blight
We live in the country that is essentially held together by the 14th amendment, section 1 of the 14th birthright, citizenship, due process and equality before law. Right, that's right. Before the Supreme Court as we speak. We were reinvented by the 14th amendment and we still live under it. If we, if we can hold it. You know, what's at stake here is more than just history. It's the social order. I mean, it's this idea that if you, if you let these crazy left wing historians and universities alter the national story that fifth graders learn, eighth graders, tenth graders and college students, the social order could fall apart, family values could fall apart. And look, it's one of the reasons the right is so exercised about gender because that is a relatively new challenge to the nature of history, if you like. But it's ultimately here a question of who controls the social and cultural order. History is always at the center of that. It's always the first problem.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Absolutely. I mean, and the 14th amendment, basically animated by the Declaration of Independence, that gives us a creed that says all men are created equal. And the progress of America since that moment has been try to realize that. And that's why you have this attack now even in some ways on the Declaration as a creed saying, as a sort of creed for America and saying, no, America is not just a country about a creed. It's a country about, you know, a race. It's about religion, it's about something that doesn't have that inclusive, encompassing thing. So the declaration in the 14th Amendment, talking about equality has been a target for people who want a different vision of what the country is about. A white nation.
Jon Stewart
Look, the algorithm is killing us. The algorithm, the way that it incentivizes the hostility and weaponizes ideology and all the, it just, it's, it, it's not right. But the, the antidote, the antidote is information. And that's where ground news comes in. Ground news. It's this website nap. It's designed to give readers a better way, an easier way to navigate the news. It, it pulls together every article about the same news story from all outlets all over the world and puts them in one place and not, not incentivized for like the worst, most hostile, most partisan take. It tells you where it's coming from. You, you can see starkly in black and white how these different organizations and algorithms are manipulating the information that we get. They show you how reliable the source is and who's funding it. Who's funding it. Follow the money. Know who's behind the headline. Oh, who is this Rupert Murdoch fella? He seems delightful. He seems to have a somewhat pointed view of the world. I'm telling you, man. The Nobel Peace Centers even mentioned that Ground News is an excellent way to stay informed. Noble Peace center, that's I think, the one that Trump started. I think it 3D prints Nobel Peace Prizes and just hands them out. The platform's independently operated, supported by its subscribers, so they stay independent and they stay mission driven. They don't get sucked into this slop. If you want to see the full picture, go to Ground News. They can help you through the noise and get to the heart of the news. Go to groundnews.com stewart subscribe for 40% off the unlimited access Vantage subscription discount available only for a limited time. This brings the price down to like $5 a month. That's ground news.com stewart or scan the QR code on the screen. I'm fascinated by the idea that by telling the stories of diverse populations. Why do you think they view that as degrading to our national history and not something that is more remarkable about our national history in terms of where we've come? I mean, you've studied Douglas. Maybe the best scholar on Douglas. You know, reanimate him for a moment. Would he be astonished by the progress made or disappointed that we're still litigating the very same structural issues that he litigated?
David Blight
Both. No, he would both.
Jon Stewart
Damn you and your nuance.
David Blight
Oh, I know these historians, these historians are always saying on the one hand, on the other hand, but, but truly, Douglass would be astonished at some of this progress, but he'd be disgusted. He'd be. Oh Lord. He'd be disgusted at this attempt to erase all of that progress that has been made. The best way to understand that is Douglass gave a. A very important speech in 1869, right at the point of the passage of the 15th amendment, the voting Rights Amendment. He called it the composite nation. It's one of the most beautiful expressions you would ever read. And note the date again. This is 1869.
Gillian Spear
Right.
David Blight
It reads like a multiculturalism manifesto, you know, from a school system in the, in the 1990s.
Jon Stewart
Woke. Yeah. No, yeah, Douglas was woke. I think most people would agree Douglas was woke up.
David Blight
The dude was into pluralism. And the speech expresses this beautiful, you know, crazy quilt of America. And in the middle of it, he stops, he takes up the great present issue of that moment and he makes the case for Chinese immigration. Chinese immigration was becoming a huge issue, especially from the West.
Jon Stewart
Right.
David Blight
And there's Douglas saying, get ready, America. They're coming and they got a 3,000 year old civilization. Stuff we never thought about before. Yes, they have alien language. Yes. They have alien religion. But, man, these are amazing people. Get ready for them. And. And anyway, so.
Jon Stewart
But even that, though. Think. Think about that, though. That moment in history, 1869, Douglas says that. And what are the two things that occur almost right after that?
David Blight
Right.
Jon Stewart
There is the birthright citizenship case about a Chinese immigrant.
David Blight
Exactly.
Jon Stewart
But then the second thing is the south reinstates, takes back. The country takes back. Right. Reanimates the very thing that created the progress that Douglass is talking about.
David Blight
It's the single most hopeful moment of Douglass's life.
Jon Stewart
Yes.
David Blight
And he never. John, he never gave that speech that I could find after about 1871. It was falling apart.
Jon Stewart
Right.
Narrator/Announcer
Yeah.
Annette Gordon-Reed
I was doing a research for a book and found my great, great grandfather's name on a voter list in Texas in 1867. And it was amazing. And then I thought. Then I got sad because I realized what's going to happen in a couple of years, Texas is going to. I mean, all this stuff is going to be rolled back and he's going to be put back into a state of. Not chattel, but near. Near chattel. Almost as bad as slavery during that time period, stripped of rights and so forth.
Jon Stewart
And is the idea that the right would like that moment erased from the record or de. Emphasized? What is. What is the purpose of it? And, Annette, you face this. I mean, again, when we talk about Douglas with David Blight, but also Sally Hemings and Jefferson with Annette Gordon Reed, I mean, your scholarship on that, unparalleled. So is that an analogous historical figure in terms. Do they want that relationship erased?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Well, you know, when I was working on this subject, it occurred to me that I think a lot of it when I listen to people has to do with this question of a white nation. If somehow a person who is a symbol of the country had seven children with a woman who is not. Who is not purely white, then what does that say about the country as a white nation? I mean, an actual, literal founding father here of not just white people, but of people who were black and who has descendants who still identify themselves as black. So a lot of it is just. It's a vision of themselves and a vision of what they want the present to be. To sort of situate the past, to sort of, you know, put us on the path to getting to a place that is comfortable to them, and that is one where whites are in ascendancy and people of color are, you know, are lower down or people who are discriminated against.
Jon Stewart
I want to ask you about the process of that. Because, you know, David, you brought this up earlier. That idea of woken and diversity being a buzzword about this has. We have to take woke out. You know, I think Trump did the executive order restoring truth and sanity to American history, and it was all about removing any idea of woke. The idea being that the left or the elites are, are so focused on issues of race or gender or those kinds of things. But those, the people that were under those discriminary discrimination policies, they didn't create those distinctions. They had to live under them. The idea of obsession with race or gender doesn't come from those who suffered under it. It was the ruling class that defined those groups.
David Blight
Well, that's true. No question. Black folk didn't write the pro slavery laws. No, black folk didn't write or define
Jon Stewart
themselves as something different.
David Blight
They weren't part of the self definition of being chattel by any means. Of course. Now, whether the right wants total erasure, there are many different parts of the right, as you well know, John. And, and some of them would say, oh, they just want to talk about emphasis. You know, they don't want to lose Jefferson in the story of Sally Hemings. Annette could tell us hours on that. They don't want to lose Abraham Lincoln in the stories of the complexities of how emancipation actually happened. They don't want to lose George Washington in the story of how the American Revolution was won and how bloody it was and how difficult and contingent it was and how they almost didn't win, and so on and so on and so on. There are parts of the right who really are white nationalists. And I've learned this, I guess I'd say the hard way. I recently challenged Kevin Roberts, the president.
Jon Stewart
Kevin ROBERTS PRESIDENT of Heritage FOUNDATION Yeah, yeah.
David Blight
I challenged him to have a debate and we ended up doing an hour and 10 minute podcast.
Narrator/Announcer
Really?
David Blight
Oh, yeah, yeah. And look, we set two rules. We were going to be civil and. Sorry, we really tried. We did all right on that one, mostly. And we were going to stay in our lane because Kevin is a historian, his PhD in history from UT Austin and his dissertation was on slavery in Louisiana and It's not bad, 25 years ago.
Jon Stewart
And he's also one of the architects of the New right, which is that Project 2025.
David Blight
Absolutely.
Jon Stewart
What they want in the future, and has been on record as saying he wants the future to be Trumpism.
David Blight
Absolutely. And, and some of these executive orders come right out of Project 2025, verbatim language.
Jon Stewart
Right.
David Blight
They were written over at Heritage foundation. Many of them. But Kevin and I stayed in our lane as historians. We tried to be civil and by and large it didn't work.
Jon Stewart
Really well.
David Blight
We did remain civil. I was his host. I couldn't do, you know.
Jon Stewart
Wow. I've been in that position.
David Blight
I bet you have.
Jon Stewart
Yeah.
David Blight
You've interviewed a few.
Jon Stewart
It works out better than other times.
David Blight
You've interviewed a few people. You'd like to kick that, I'm sure.
Jon Stewart
Yeah, probably correct.
David Blight
Is that safe to say?
Jon Stewart
What was, what did you think? Do you think he's being disingenuous then? What was his, Especially if he's written, you know, a dissertation on slavery in Louisiana. I mean, surely he understands the complexity of it. Is he now being disingenuous for a purely political project?
David Blight
Sometimes he is. I'm totally convinced of that. He, he can read off, you know, 12 talking points for the Trump White House in two minutes. He's very good at that. But often the disingenuity, if that's the right word, comes when they start cherry picking, when they start saying, well, there was this one exhibit at the African American History Museum that said this that they should not have said, or there's that art museum over there that suggested that sculpture has something to do with scientific racism, which sometimes it does. But they will pick out a single cherry picked example somewhere and say, you see, the whole damn institution has gone to hell with a bunch of liberals and radicals.
Jon Stewart
They confuse anecdote with data.
David Blight
Absolutely.
Jon Stewart
Annette, in your experience, because the Sally Hemings thing was a very different situation in that there was a real denial of the reality of it. Their, their, their position. There wasn't cherry picking emphasis. It was. No, that's not true.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
None of those folks descended from Jefferson and Hemings. It's just not. You're lying.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Well, yeah. I mean, it was denial for the reason that I was suggesting before, that there was an image of Jefferson as almost the personification of America in some ways. That's not a crazy thing. That's one of the reasons he's an interesting figure for me, because you can write about so much in American history through his life about slavery, race, politics, foreign policy, all of those things. And so he was a hero to people in a particular way and they had sort of a personal identification with him and they didn't want to leave that behind. But I do want to say something about the museum. One of the interesting points that's happened here is that during the President's first term, I believe it was in the first term, he visited the museum and he was very complimentary of it.
David Blight
Yeah.
Annette Gordon-Reed
I mean, he thought it, you know, it was a. It was an uplifting story. And then it changed after, I don't know, the Heritage foundation or the new project that they put in place had to sort of alter the way they thought about these kinds of things. And all of a sudden it becomes this cherry picking that you're talking about. What could be more inspirational than that museum? It's just odd to think that people didn't see that as a story of the bad and the good. Talking about it's sort of a progressive understanding of things are getting better and better as you go up the floors. And so it's exactly something that was made to, in lots of ways, to honor America, not to be critical of it.
David Blight
Oh, yeah, not at all. Is the reason it was the hottest ticket in Washington, right?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Absolutely. Because people do really want to know. My experience is people really want to know the truth and can handle it.
David Blight
And that was right at the beginning of his first term. I think that was like February of 17 or something. But they hadn't really been fighting the culture wars to win yet. I mean, to really win. Now they are.
Jon Stewart
But why do they think. Why would you think that a more nuanced version of the history of this country is something to win or that that's part of a culture war? Is the idea that if we acknowledge the complexity of it, we owe a debt to those who suffered? Is it. Is it about if. If you do acknowledge that there was explicit racist or exclusionary policy that built so much of the equity of this country? If you acknowledge that, are you then saying, and now there is a debt to that acknowledgment?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Absolutely. The thing is to say that black people. Okay, let's just. It's usually black and white. It's much more complicated now in lots of ways with other minority groups. The idea is nothing happened to you. The disparities that we see in health care and education and wealth, all of those things, it's because you have not pulled yourself up by your bootstraps. Nothing has happened to you. And if you tell a story, if you tell young people. Wait a minute. You know, when Annette Gordon was a little girl at six, when she went to the doctor, she had to go to a separate waiting room that was much smaller and didn't have the accoutrements of the other side of the white one. Or if you had to sit in the balcony, if you talked about all those things and that they happen to people, millions of people over the years, then you do owe them a debt. You do feel sympathy for them and the lack. This notion that you shouldn't have empathy for people or sympathy for people is a big part of their thinking because they really don't like the idea of social programs of any kind of responsibility that people have to try to alleviate those circumstances. So it's, it's a way of saying, you know, we don't, you know, we don't have any responsibility. The society has no responsibility for the legal impediments that were put upon people for many, many decades.
Jon Stewart
You guys are familiar with the Internet. You've been on the Internet. You probably have a computer. You probably have a. It's probably on your phone and those kinds of things. You probably think, oh, look at me looking up, looking things up. I like to look things up. I like information. I like surfing the web. But I don't know if you realize this. Somebody, somebody out there is checking you out. It's gotten to the point you don't even think about it until all of a sudden you have that moment of, is this tracking everything that. And everywhere that I am going and doing. And it's just a wonderful moment of paranoia that we all feel. And then we think to ourselves, well, oh, I'm just helpless. What I, I'm helpless because I want to buy Crocs. I would certainly not want that information to be out there, but I have to do it and I'm going to do it on Amazon and all. But you're not helpless. Here's why you're not helpless. Our sponsor, our sponsor incognito, is that they're, they're the game that makes you not be helpless to all this. Here's the thing. When you're on the Internet, man, you are a mark. They're data brokers, companies that, that find the information that you've put on there or that they're tracking whatever and they sell it to other companies or scammers. Incog can save the day. They can remove your info from these data brokers who, who aggregate it and they, and they sell your information. You could buy your Crocs in peace. And look, you and I both know they are not. It's not an attractive shoe. They're not a sponsor of this program. So I can tell you this.
David Blight
They're.
Jon Stewart
Be honest with you. They're not even that comfortable. Incog removes your info from the data brokers. The less data brokers have on you, the harder it is for scammers to get. You go to incog.com stewart use code stewart for 60% off. Incog helps wipe yourself from the Internet. They can't harm you if they can't find you. Click the link in the description to claim your 60% off and get your personal data off the market. Incogni.com Stewart. What's so interesting about that to me is so I think about it, and maybe this is far afield, but I think about globalization and what it has done to the sort of the center of the country and the manufacturing base and, you know, working, working class whites, I would say, are the primary victims of that kind of job loss. Right. It's very common in this country to say the policies that were instituted destroyed that the economic prospects for those folks in that part of the country. It led them to deaths of despair. It brought out a lot of different vices and those kinds of things. And we're going to take policy measures to repair that damage. We're going to levy tariffs, we're going to do various things to try and alleviate the suffering that occurred from the policies that were put in place. Isn't that the exact story of racially exclusionary policies? Why is that in any way a controversial issue?
David Blight
Well, okay, good question.
Jon Stewart
I mean, I grew up, I'm taking this class. All right, man, I'm doing this.
David Blight
Well, you get an A already. All right, done. But you know, I grew up in an auto town, Flint, Michigan. I grew up in an automaker family, that white working class Midwest. That's where I'm from. So there's no question Democrats lost that white working class and Republicans gained major portions of it because of globalization, because of loss of jobs, because of sending jobs abroad, and on and on and on. No question. But what's also happened in that process is they have taught that white working class and a whole lot of other people to distrust institutions like universities, distrust institutions like great museums, distrust this whole apparatus that Annette and I are just two small parts of the practice of history, the practice of academic, the creation of academic knowledge. And we got surprised by that. And this is where the left has to take at least a look in the mirror and realize that for years we were being distrusted and didn't really even know it. And we forgot that only about 47% of Americans ever even go to college, any kind of college. And the slight majority of this country never sets foot on a college campus even for a football game, because they can't afford it. So, you know, we lost touch in some ways. We made our creation of knowledge obscure in Many ways. Although many of us, for years and years on a net, you know, was the spearhead of this because of. Of the Sally Hemings case. And that took time to convince Monticello and the country of. Of its truth.
Jon Stewart
Right. But there's a resentment there. Yeah. Because of its truth.
David Blight
Well, that's true, too.
Jon Stewart
There's a resentment towards Annette or towards you.
David Blight
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
For even bringing up that truth.
David Blight
Telling us the painful stories.
Jon Stewart
That's right.
David Blight
Don't tell us those painful stories make us feel good again.
Jon Stewart
And it makes me feel like it's a battle over who the real victims are. And now the white working class is saying, no, no, no, no, no. It's not the woke that are the victim, it's us. Yeah, we're actually the victim.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Yeah.
Narrator/Announcer
Yeah.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Well, there's the racial story that's involved in this as well. I mean, the white working class, you know, beloved of news organizations, so forth, the diner stories and so forth.
Jon Stewart
Sure.
Annette Gordon-Reed
They represent. They're seen as representing real Americans in some ways. And this is sort of a way of saying that black people are kind of not real Americans explicitly.
Jon Stewart
So even the heritage Americans.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Yeah, yeah, exactly. And the truth is, most African American people are descended from people who came here in the 1700s, in the early 1700s, you know, so it. We would certainly be people who have a history here for very, very, you know, for centuries. And yet we're not real Americans. So when you think about when people are told that the government. And that's the other thing that they. If not only mistrusting universities, the government is the problem. So we're an industrialized country that doesn't have a social welfare system anywhere alike, that approaches any place else in Europe in our sort of people who have comparable types of societies. And that, as social scientists suggest is because of the racial question here, is that people don't want those people, those people's children or those people to have, you know, to be helped in any way. And so it's. It's very much a sort of a heritage Christian nationalist kind of understanding of who belongs in this country.
Jon Stewart
But at the core of it, is it resource guarding? Because I think, you see, in some. I mean, I say that only because I have dogs.
Annette Gordon-Reed
I was gonna say because you have a dog.
Jon Stewart
I have a dog. So I'm always thinking cognitive.
Annette Gordon-Reed
I do too.
Jon Stewart
Like, oh, they resource guard.
Gillian Spear
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
And in some ways, is that the resentment of. You know, you hear that a lot. If we weren't spending money on these immigrants and the health care, my life wouldn't be hard, but we're certainly not the only country with a complicated history.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Oh, not at all, not at all.
David Blight
Talk to the Russians and the Germans and. Right. Yeah. Well, but. But, you know, we do have something a little peculiar on them. And that is, you know, talk to common Russians about progress. They might ask you what the hell that is. You know, talk to whatever generation of Germans about progress. But Americans have this. I don't know if it's DNA in the water, in the air, wherever it all comes from, there's this. It's an American mythology. It's deep in American mythology.
Jon Stewart
Or exceptionalism. Yeah.
David Blight
This place has to be about progress. And these messy, complicated, conflicted, difficult histories are. Are disrupting that progress, are showing us that. Oh, my God. Well, look, our job has been for years, and we. And actually, we're paying the price for some of our victories. I mean, I. I think so. And I. I wonder if Annette doesn't.
Jon Stewart
You're talking about victory, progress in terms of civil rights and those kinds of things. It's. It breeding resentment in.
David Blight
But even writing the new histories. I mean, both of us here came of age with the transformations of the subject of American history. Race was the big subject for both of us, but many others, you know, the rewriting of American. The history of American foreign policy, the rewriting of the American west because of the explosion of scholarship on Native American history. And sometimes, you know, maybe we did go overboard. Maybe we did stop studying the presidency over.
Jon Stewart
When you say overboard, do you mean in terms of painting it as a story of pure negative impulse or colonizer versus victim that in that way or.
David Blight
Well, to some extent, that. And if. If I hear one more student in a seminar use the term settler colonialism for just everything they want, I will stop them. Because there are other. Other ways into American history.
Jon Stewart
Right.
David Blight
But I think it's more than just, you know, shame or whatever. No, that's not. I'm talking about just the explosion of the new histories. I mean, there's so many new histories. We are so pluralistic.
Jon Stewart
Annette, do you see that as well? Do you. Do you see a kind of excess in. In the scholarship? Because it. It. It feels like it's never excess if. It's just. If people are just exploring those histories. As long as there are other options to be studied. You know, if a college only offered you a narrow slice of very specific colonialist victim histories, but it. It sounds like we're expanding the palette.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Yeah, I would, you know, I would, you know, depart from David a little bit on this, because I think it's best, basically comes down to the sort of cherry picking that we're talking about before that. People come and they look, go to a university and they find some class that they think is crazy and say, this is what people are being taught.
Jon Stewart
Right.
David Blight
Judged by its title, usually by title.
Annette Gordon-Reed
And people would say, you can't take Shakespeare anymore. There are no classics. I went to Dartmouth. And people would make these complaints about what's not there on the curriculum, but all the traditional things were there. It's just that they weren't focusing yet on that. So I think it's more people being upset because they don't want other people, they don't want those kinds of things available at all. Even though what they want is still there.
Jon Stewart
That's the point. They don't want it available at all. It's a food court. And just because you've introduced Panda Express and empanadas doesn't mean you can't still go to McDonald's.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Exactly.
Jon Stewart
It's all still there, but it's.
Annette Gordon-Reed
The expansion of it is frightening.
Jon Stewart
Yes.
Annette Gordon-Reed
I mean, when people come to something that you.
Narrator/Announcer
Yes.
Annette Gordon-Reed
You're not used to this. You're used to the very things that you always went to. And now you have all these alternatives and, you know, it's Starbucks. You know, I, you know, I want my coffee, but I'm resentful that other people are getting the, the no whip, Frappuccino, whatever. But you can have those things if you want them.
Jon Stewart
You can tell it's around lunchtime for all of us. And all the analogies now are going to be food, food related. But it's, it's all taken as an attack. What are the ways, you know, so let's think about, you know, there are countries, obviously, with even more complicated. South Africa is a great example. And now there's this real renaissance and nostalgia for apartheid South Africa, Rhodesia and those kinds of areas. You see it on social media and all these other things. Why is there a nostalgia for that? And, and did South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commissions help bridge a gap to ease that? What, what's going on in these other complicated histories?
David Blight
Well, there have been many, many different attempts at truth and reconciliation, truth commissions of various kinds. In fact, we did a conference comparing all those at Yale some years ago. There are many different efforts and, and they're very difficult to do, and they're all rooted in their own cultures and their own histories. But, but thank God that the world has at least attempted to do this in Many different. From India to Germany to South America, South Africa, you name it. Nostalgia for past. It's a human urge, you know, nostalgia for the British Empire when, you know, for some, not just Brits, there are Americans who are Anglophiles and may yearn for, I don't know, some time in the history of the British Empire. They better not. Look at some of those wars the British fought in Africa or India. Sure, that's going to get ugly.
Jon Stewart
Or amongst themselves.
David Blight
Or amongst themselves.
Jon Stewart
I think sometimes there's this feeling that if it was just homogeneous, there wouldn't be issues. But human beings will always find a way to divide ourselves. Oh, you know, and if you just. You can go back to, well, if it was just this Anglicized version of Christian nationalism and you're like, right, but whose version of it? And suddenly you're back in the Protestant Catholic wars. You're back into the Hundred Years wars, you know, you're back into a whole other era.
Narrator/Announcer
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
Of violence and division just based on different characteristics. Sure.
David Blight
I once I was teaching in Germany 30 some years ago and I showed Ken Burns's film series on the Civil War, all dubbed into German, by the way. It was weird. But anyway, a German student came up to me and said, why is it you Americans think that anything that happened to you was the greatest, the biggest, the bloodiest? And he said, have Americans ever heard of the Thirty Years War? And I said, no, probably not. You know, I'm sorry, but they probably haven't. It's a big country, you know, we don't do comparison that often, but. Or we should do more. But, you know, the burden is still on us. It's still on us historians to make what we do clear, to translate what we do. And I think, well, you've got two historians here who've been attempting to do this for years and years and years, to reach out to real people who read books, you know, the public, to write in ways that are not only accessible, but good narrative based on deep research, but good narrative. And historians lost touch with some of that over the years. The revolution in social history, the revolution in this kind of method, that kind of theory. But there's a real movement now. I think it's an interesting. In fact, this conference I'm running here right now is all about this. To take history to the public, take good history to the public, whether it's in museum exhibitions, in our books, in lectures, tell the big complicated stories.
Jon Stewart
I like to eat things in bowls. Bowls, Bowls. All types of bowls. You ever see that, Leslie Jones Rap from SNL Bowls.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Bowls.
Jon Stewart
It's about. I think it was the song 8080 Bryant I'm a back home Ball or something like that. I hope this is not a digression, but I think bowls are probably the best receptacle by which man has created to eat things out of. Good enough for my dog, it's good enough for me. And my favorite thing to put in bowls. I'm not telling you anything you don't already know. Cereal. I love a nice cereal. And I'm telling you something. I used to eat it, all the sugary stuff and always felt like, you know, I felt like Superman for like seven minutes and then a crash. That makes you question why God ever put you on this earth. My point is that Magic Spoon makes healthy cereal. You can still eat it out of a bowl, but you won't get that crazy up and down crap. 13 grams of protein, no sugar.05 grams of net carbs per serving. Comes in great flavors. Fruity, Frosted Cocoa, Cinnamon Crunch. Come on, what's better than a bowl? What's better than cereal? What's better than Magic Spoon? Nothing. Look for Magic Spoon on Amazon or at your nearest grocery store. And there are plant based versions of the cereal too. Even vegans get to feel like they had a childhood. You'll find vegan options at Whole foods or get $5 off your next order at magicspoon.com TWS that's magic spoon.com TWS for $5 off. You know, Juneteenth is coming June 19th and people may not know, but you, you played a crucial role in, I'm embarrassed to even say, when I was younger going to school, I had no idea of that, the significance of that date this, you know, we are taught the Emancipation Proclamation and that's kind of the end of it. There's an Emancipation Proclamation. And after that we were good. And then there was a little kerfuffle and maybe the 60s.
David Blight
Somebody here wrote a book on that.
Jon Stewart
That's what I'm saying. So you know, Annette, that's coming up. Is, is that what was your process like in bringing that story more to the public forefront and getting the acknowledgement of it from a government that's resistant to that kind of acknowledgment?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Well, it was a pandemic book.
Jon Stewart
Oh, that's the idea. If you don't leave the house.
Annette Gordon-Reed
If you don't leave the house, get
David Blight
a lot of writing done.
Jon Stewart
Fair enough.
Annette Gordon-Reed
I was there in Manhattan and only going out to Central park for breaks. And so Forth. But I thought that I could tell the story of Texas and this day through my family story. And I think that is David's point about making things accessible. People like stories about other people, you know, and that was the hook to try to do it. I hadn't thought that the government. I hadn't thought that there would be a national holiday. There was another woman who's responsible, Opal Lee, who's more responsible for all of that. But the timing was good and, you know, I worked on it and got it out. And it was a way to try to get people to think about not just Emancipation Proclamation, but also to think about how African Americans in Texas and other places in some ways liberated themselves by leaving the plantations and were responsible for, in some ways for their own. For their own freedom. I thought it would be. This was sort of a celebration of human rights, that people in the country could just say, this is just a milestone. It's not the end of everything. It didn't end slavery. It didn't end the whole. In the thing. The slavery ends with the fight.
Brittany Mamedovic
Right.
Annette Gordon-Reed
But it was some. It's a marker for people to latch on to.
Jon Stewart
Can I. Can I ask what the response is? Because I'm curious. Sometimes the standard historian framing, and you brought up Ken Burns, is you're studying this other period and you're looking for all the source material and you're sorting out who might have been lionizing themselves self aggrandizement. Who is. How are they manipulating the details of the events versus your story about. Through the lens of your family in Texas, where it's a much more personal story and I would imagine harder to refute through the lens of intentional attacks.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Yeah, well, I think it's difficult because I don't write about myself. It's much easier to write about other people and other people's families because, you know, it's just you're. You're too much into it. But by the same token, these are my impressions of my past. And so people can't. And this is what I think people can't come and say, that's not how you felt, you know, right. Watching Billy Jack. That's not how you. That's not how you felt when you saw those movies.
Jon Stewart
And you know, by the way, one of my favorites, I think that inform that, you know a lot about people, which side of the town they were empathizing in. Billy J. If, you know people that. That watch Billy Jack and they. And you know which side they're empathizing on, that tells You a lot about where their politics are.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Oh, I mean, that. Those movies, I try to explain it to my kids. They were the best in my town, my little East Texas, you know, very, very conservative town. All of these people were just whipping and, you know, in favor of Billy Jack and his compatriots. I'm thinking, wait a minute. Are you the same folks?
Narrator/Announcer
Do you understand.
Jon Stewart
Do you understand what this is about?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Do you understand what this is about? I'm coming at this very differently.
David Blight
I was a high school teacher when Billy J. Man, that was hot. I don't know how many times I saw that with students.
Jon Stewart
Yeah, but.
Annette Gordon-Reed
But you tell those. Those kinds of stories and people relate to them and that. And. And you give them history, and then it. It becomes a part of the whole thing taken together, you. That you hope that they learn something. It's a different way of doing it.
Jon Stewart
But I want to ask you what's somewhat confusing about. For me about this 250th celebration is one of the things that. That, you know, we were always taught about was this idea of American exceptionalism. And that American exceptionalism was about the creed. It really was about the Declaration of Independence and all men are created equal. And. And that is what separated. And to go back to blood and soil feels like an admission of defeat. It feels like we're then saying, actually we're not exceptional. We're not a shining city on a hill. We're just like every other nationalist movement in the history of. Of the world. So why wouldn't the right embrace what truly is exceptional about the country? This creed, so difficult to achieve, but certainly worth the. The pursuit. Annette, what do you think of that?
Annette Gordon-Reed
Well, a lot goes along with that. If you believe in the creed, you believe. I mean, and there have always been a segment of Americans when those words were written and when Jefferson said them. And we don't have time to go into him on all of this, but there were always people who disputed that notion. And the Civil War in the south explicitly rejected it in the cornerstone speech. We don't believe those things. Jefferson was wrong, essentially, what they say. So we've always had that some percentage
Jon Stewart
of people tell me what the cornerstone speech is, because I'm not familiar with the cornerstone speech.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Alexander, the Vice President of the Confederacy, wrote a speech basically saying that the cornerstone of this new Southern society they were making was the idea that the African race was not created equal to white race. And he calls out Jefferson and says, basically they were wrong. They believed, you know, essentially a necessary evil. But they believed that slavery was the wrong thing. And we don't believe that. We believe that that is the natural state of African Americans right to be in slavery.
Jon Stewart
And yet somehow. Somehow in the early 1900s, it became about states rights as they might understand.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Well, because at some point, when racism becomes. They understand it's a dirty word in some way. You have to say, no, it's not. And they know they were wrong. You know, when people know they're wrong, they come up with some kind of explanation for what it is they're doing. And it is the tariff. You know, you kill 600,000 people about the tariff. Right. It's like, no, I don't think so. So it.
Jon Stewart
The notion changes, especially when the cornerstone speech exists. When. When. When. When it's. When it's on record.
David Blight
Yeah, on record. And it was just the beginning. I mean, this. Every secession resolution told the world of the states exactly what it was told the world they were seceding, protect a racial system, a labor system. And by the way, that was a slave labor system. But, John, back to your creedal, your creed question. I think it's crucial here. It's absolutely crucial. The creeds were dangerous. The creeds are dangerous. That declaration of those four first principles, life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, and the doctrine of consent and the right of revolution, they're dangerous. And nobody appropriated them quite as vigorously, forcefully, hopefully, as did black Americans eventually. And the whole abolition movement. Annette and I were just doing a teacher institute together in Philadelphia about the Constitution, and she heard me on this. But if a person goes and just reads the Declaration today, which we'll be hearing endlessly in the next week or two, stop and look. Jefferson spent more words, and so did the whole committee that wrote it, defending the right of revolution than they did of the other natural rights. Almost as though life and liberty and consent were givens. But that right of revolution, you're gonna overthrow a monarchy, you're gonna overthrow a government. They spent 22 lines of the Declaration justifying that as a human right. Those are dangerous creeds. But you're right, we all own the creeds. And why doesn't the right wanna embrace the creeds a little more? Well, they do to their own purposes. But those creeds were dangerous too. Depends on who gets to use them.
Annette Gordon-Reed
They've seen how people have used them. As you were saying here, the first people who file petitions, freedom suits, all of those things are African American people who said, wait a minute, we've created this country, and that is an exceptional thing. I mean, to go from A monarchy to a republic.
Jon Stewart
Right.
Annette Gordon-Reed
In this modern world, that's a big deal.
David Blight
And it damn near didn't work.
Annette Gordon-Reed
And it almost didn't work.
David Blight
I mean, it was contingent at every stage.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Exactly. It was contingent at every stage. And so when you see the people who have used this, black people have used it, women used it In Seneca Falls, 1848, gay people have used it, labor movement. Labor movement used it, said the right to strike. All those things come out of this notion of the creed.
Gillian Spear
And.
Annette Gordon-Reed
And so if you don't like those things, if you don't want to see a racial hierarchy leveled, if you don't want equal rights for women, if you don't want labor unions to be able to collectively bargain, if you don't want immigrants, I mean, the creed was used to teach people who came to the country, these are the things. These are the American founding documents. And if you believe these things and you support this, you are an American. If you don't like those. Those people, those ideas, then you're going to be. Going to be against it. The creed, as David said, is very, very dangerous because of who in history shows who has used those things to make a different place for themselves.
Jon Stewart
Is it the success then of the creed that. And the people that have used that as a fulcrum to elevate themselves to their natural unalienable rights. Is the success of that what animates the backlash? Always, you know, we talk about kind of the idea of, you know, well, let's look at Germany. So Germany tries to reckon with its past, and they create laws that you can't deny the Holocaust and all these other things. And, you know, people view it as, this is a successful way of facing up to a difficult past. But nothing has animated in Germany right now more than the far right.
David Blight
Yeah, I was just in Berlin a week, two weeks ago, John. I'd give a lecture at the American Academy, and I spent some time in central Berlin.
Jon Stewart
When do you guys have office hours? All I'm hearing about it, it's June, man. I'm down here doing a speech. I'm over here signing a book. Come on.
David Blight
Yeah, well, it's June, man.
Jon Stewart
When do they come in for the office hours? All right, I'll accept it.
David Blight
June is every academic's favorite month. In fact, I've always wondered why, if God had all that power, why didn't he create two Junes? I want two Junes anyway. But Germany has, in central Berlin and three at least, great museums. And, of course, the huge Holocaust memorial has faced its Past took time, has faced its past nationally more than any other country. And they had the most difficult past to face. But that's because the world made them do it. Yeah, the world was looking in on the Cold War made them do it, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. No one came from outside to force Americans to face their past. We have to do it. We have to do it through our politics, we have to do it through history, which makes it a political fight as well as a scholarly fight and a history fight and a teaching fight. And what we're in now is a whole new level of that. I mean, there's never been an executive branch presidency take on the entire practice of history, museums to universities, etc, like what has happened.
Jon Stewart
Certainly not in this country. I mean, it's been done. And, and not in this.
David Blight
Oh yeah, it's been done. It's been done in other autocracies.
Jon Stewart
Yeah, that's right.
David Blight
And, and that's exactly what's been done in the past year. And we are, we are catching up. We are trying to figure out with our own resources how to fight back. And we are fighting back.
Jon Stewart
Are you heartened in any way, Annette? Are you heartened in any way by sort of the small acts of defiance of that or.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Well, any act of defiance is heartening to see people doing things to stand up against it. Because as we've been saying, I mean, American people, most American people don't want a whitewashed history. And there are people who are standing up to say, you know, local school boards gets book banning and so forth. It's pulling people out who don't normally participate in these kinds of things. And that's what it's going to take. It's going to have to take people saying, we don't want to live in Hungary. Hungary didn't want to live in Hungary.
Brittany Mamedovic
Right.
Annette Gordon-Reed
After a while, and this is our great thing was you were able to think and to say what you, you know, say what you think about things. I've sat on many advisory committees and so forth recently, meetings at museums and places. And people are scared to say stuff or wondering about, can we say this? Oh, yeah.
Jon Stewart
And frightened to put their funding at risk. I mean, it's a funding issue as well.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Yeah, I'm never, you never in all years have, you know, I heard people act like that when we grew up.
David Blight
Oh, there's self censoring going on everywhere.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Everywhere.
David Blight
It's censoring from the top in places like the National Park Service, where I'm located right now. And Other federal agencies. But here's one good sign, and I think Annette knows about this. On September 26th, John, there's going to be a day or a weekend, and there's a whole coalition of organizations. The major history associations, the association of Local History, all kinds of historical associations, museums and so on have come together. And a lot of them are at this little conference I'm hosting. It's going to be a day. They're calling We Want More History. We Want More History. And it's going to be.
Jon Stewart
It's not the snappiest title.
Annette Gordon-Reed
No, it's not.
David Blight
I wasn't on the committee that created
Jon Stewart
We Want More History.
David Blight
I would take the word want out of it. Americans always want, want, want, want, want, you know, but. But it's going to be a day when every little. Every small museum, every historical society is going to be challenged. All right, what are you going to do today to fight back against this attempt to control how we get to know our history? I think in the long. I mean, there's a lot of damage being done, and I am not terribly hopeful about this, but it's very hard to take over a country's history, teaching of it, writing of it, representing it when it's been pretty free for a long time. They're not gonna win this one in the long run. They're gonna do a lot of damage along the way.
Jon Stewart
Right.
David Blight
But I don't think they win this in the long run.
Annette Gordon-Reed
And it's a political question. The question is, what do citizens do?
David Blight
Absolutely.
Annette Gordon-Reed
I mean, historians, we can do things, but as. We do things as historians, as citizens, but other people. This is about voting. It's about who's in power. And the American people have to get. Take control of that.
Jon Stewart
Well, it's so interesting you bring that up, Annette, because it is. When you look at the battle plan to take control of that, there's the historical aspect, but there really is almost more importantly the voting aspect. And when you see them rip out the pillars of the Voting Rights act or to suggest. And I'm really not sure how this event. That it's okay to gerrymander for ideological and partisan gain, but not. And if those are synonymous with race, too bad. And if. And if districts that are, you know, majority, minority lose their ability not to have minority representation, but to have their voice matter.
David Blight
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Jon Stewart
Within their cohort. That's the interesting thing, that they're not just attacking this. In. In one area, there are tentacles.
David Blight
Oh, yeah. This is a full force, widespread, well coordinated.
Jon Stewart
Does Roberts admit To that, David, you know, when you were having your debate with him, I'm curious how he would frame the difference between creed and blood in soil as a historian, or does he. Does he brush over it? Because the project, it takes, you know, precedence over everything?
David Blight
No, no, He. He. He wants to speak about creeds. He is a Christian nationalist. He's a Catholic Christian nationalist, and those labels matter to him. He used to run a small private Catholic school, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Jon Stewart
How does he square that with the American creed?
David Blight
Good question. I tried to get him to respond about separation of church and state, and he changed the subject. So, you know, that's. That's what they do. But you see, the far right wants the creeds, and they tend to talk about them by talking about how much we, the left, liberals, scholars, have soiled those creeds, have misused those creeds, have twisted those creeds, have called the abuses of those creeds a shame on the country, and on and on and on. They go on the attack immediately rather than to step back and calmly say, you know, we're all part of those creeds, all of us, and if we didn't have that separation of church and state, we may have blown apart by now, and we may again. They're very selective.
Jon Stewart
And is there any acknowledgment that any project of this kind of exceptionalism is going to. If it wasn't a battle, it wouldn't be so exceptional.
David Blight
Exactly.
Jon Stewart
If the attempt to create what's happening wasn't hard, well, everyone would do it.
David Blight
Look at every major religion in the world that founds itself on creed. It ends up fighting. It ends up having schism after schism, breakups, Protestant Reformations, and on and on and on. It's the same. If a creedal nation has set itself up to violate the creeds, because, you know, we don't obey all the Ten Commandments either, so.
Annette Gordon-Reed
But you have to have the aspirations.
Jon Stewart
Yes.
David Blight
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Brittany Mamedovic
Yes.
Annette Gordon-Reed
And that's America as an aspirational country.
David Blight
Without that, we're nowhere.
Jon Stewart
Yes.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Without that, we're nowhere. I mean, you. How can African American people. How can any group of people who've been discriminated against in this country that has the history that we have without thinking about the notion of aspirations and even, you know, not even people who've been oppressed necessarily, you have to aspire to something. Exceptionalism is problematic. I have no question about that. But the idea that you don't see what an enormously important project it was for the founding of a country based on republican. Democratic. Republicanism versus a monarchy. And to include words that people have used over the years to make a place for themselves. And that is. It's an exceptional thing, and it's something you should be proud of and we should be trumpeting, don't you think?
David Blight
Annette? This is one of the reasons some. I hate to racialize anything, but sometimes people, white people, are surprised when they encounter black patriotism, when they encounter, you know, black folks wanting to take back the flag. Take back the Declaration.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Oh, absolutely.
David Blight
You know, because they say, well, wait a minute. Why would you do that? Because it belongs to us, because we've been here forever.
Jon Stewart
Right, right.
Annette Gordon-Reed
And I mean, in some periods of times, it was. It was frowned upon for African Americans to celebrate the Fourth of July.
David Blight
Yeah.
Annette Gordon-Reed
From whites because they thought that this was. It was provocative. You're claiming these rights of themselves.
Jon Stewart
Well, Douglass himself made that famous speech about, you know, what is the Fourth of July?
David Blight
Rhetorical masterpiece, that speech. Oh, boy.
Jon Stewart
But it really is. You know, it reminds us that aspiration is the fuel of progress. It's the catalyst that drives it forward, and it's always been present. And. And the thing that I think. And maybe this is a nice place to kind of wrap it through, is what happens to a country when it begins to take its exceptionalism as birthright and not as a project worthy of constant iteration and edit and Aspiration.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Decadence.
Jon Stewart
Yes.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Degeneracy.
Jon Stewart
Yes.
David Blight
And. And, you know, maybe they would become a Roman empire that may begin to collapse with gladiators. I mean, I'm just saying, you know.
Brittany Mamedovic
Oh, that.
Jon Stewart
That would never happen here, sir. The idea that on the lawn of the People's House, half naked men would grapple seems absurd.
David Blight
No. You know. You know, John, you. I'm sure you know this, but in all those centers out there that are studying democracy, there are all kinds of these, and they do indexes. The United States is now in that middle zone of democracies that are falling back into autocracy by any measure. Any measure.
Jon Stewart
Softly and otherwise. Yeah. No, you're absolutely right.
Annette Gordon-Reed
And it's happened so quickly in a very surprising rapidity.
David Blight
Well, it's happened over a long period, but it's hitting us quickly. There's no question.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Yeah, definitely.
Jon Stewart
One of the great bulwarks against that slide is the work of fabulous historians. And I thank you both just for the incredible work you both do and. And the fact that you help build that wall, that. That is protective against those kinds of things. David Blight Sterling professor of history at Yale University and Ed Gordon Reed, the Carl Loeb University professor at, at, at Harvard University. Guys, thank you so much for, for joining us today. Really appreciate it.
David Blight
Thank you.
Annette Gordon-Reed
John, thank you for having us.
David Blight
That's great. Thanks.
Jon Stewart
Folks, we've all got great ideas rattling around our heads about businesses, but if you, if you got a business idea and you want to make some dollars, there is a company that can help you make that pipe dream a reality. And that Shopify. All the dumb ideas that I have rattling around in my head, I can use Shopify to make a reality. It's the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world. It's actually 10% of all E commerce in the United States. Shopify is the commerce platform behind that. So you can't, you can't go wrong. And it's easier to get on than Shark Tank. What are you doing? You're waiting for Shark Tank, aren't you? I know what you're doing. You're sitting at home and you're thinking, I'll tell that Kevin o' Leary off. I'll tell him what I really think of him. Mr. Wonderful. Mr. Not so wonderful. Give him a nice solid knuckle sandwich when he tells me, my thing's a loser. No, don't even worry about that. Shopify is the thing that will help you elevate your business idea and make it a success. You don't need him. Stupid Kevin o'. Leary. Why is he always on television and movies? I don't want him around. Don't like him. Sorry, that was aggression. But the important thing is this Shopify, you don't even need that dude takes care of all of it. Helps you become a success. It's time to turn those what ifs into with Shopify today. Sign up for your $1 per month trial today at shopify.com TWS. Go to shopify.com/TWS. I could talk to historians all day.
Gillian Spear
I can tell.
Jon Stewart
Like, I think to the point where, like, I think they're like, dude, I. Office hours are over.
Gillian Spear
But you keep getting A's in all these classes. Professor on they're like, you get an A.
Jon Stewart
You get an A and 4.0, baby. Stunningly, when I was in college, I. I didn't get any of those a I. No, none of it. I don't know. I don't know what the hell happened. Where suddenly I was like, ooh, knowledge.
Gillian Spear
I think that's fair. I feel like college is kind of wasted on young people who don't have the same impression of, like, oh, my God, I get to just learn from these people. That's insane.
Jon Stewart
It is interesting that the view on the right is that, you know, these colleges are indoctrination centers of this left wing, you know, bias and all that. But my experience with college students, because I have two of them, is that overwhelmingly, the ethos at college is not indoctrination. But how am I going to get a job?
Brittany Mamedovic
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
How am I going to meet a partner? How am I going to get drunk? Like, overwhelmingly, college is not these hotbeds of indoctrination.
Gillian Spear
Yeah. It's almost like they're being disingenuous when they say that.
Jon Stewart
Well, Jillian, I didn't want to say it in that way.
Gillian Spear
They're like, look at these college students with all their ideology. I'm like, I would love for you to turn that mirror on yourself, bro.
Jon Stewart
Turn it on yourself, bro. Because really, they're just looking to score some gummies.
Gillian Spear
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
It's not that hard. It's not that serious. And they're all like, everywhere you look. And I'm like, I've met some of these STEM students, dude. They wouldn't. They're literally just like, I can't believe they gave me 20 pages of problems. What the is happening to my life?
Gillian Spear
Yeah, they're just like cold brew all night in the library trying to make it through.
Jon Stewart
Wait a minute. I just noticed Brittany.
Brittany Mamedovic
Yes.
Jon Stewart
You're rocking the Stevie Nicks. What? What happened there? Taylor Swift went to the thing and they all designed their own shirts, and
Brittany Mamedovic
they've exploded, exploded, exploded everywhere.
Jon Stewart
Nick's puns. It's all.
Narrator/Announcer
I know.
Brittany Mamedovic
It's so fun.
Gillian Spear
I saw the New York Philharmonic has a shirt out that's Philharmonic.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Really?
Gillian Spear
Yeah.
Brittany Mamedovic
It's funny.
Jon Stewart
I imagine Nick at night should be jumping on this.
Gillian Spear
That's a good one.
Jon Stewart
Nickelodeon.
Gillian Spear
Oh, my God, they got to rebrand that for next year. Nicks at night. Let's go.
Brittany Mamedovic
Just to be clear, I did not make this myself. Like, she did.
Jon Stewart
Now, do they have. Are they already selling those?
Brittany Mamedovic
Absolutely, yes. Like, multiple places are just. Yeah, yeah, I did overnight this, but yeah.
Jon Stewart
Why is it that I can never catch that lightning in a bottle? You know, she effort. She's effortless. Taylor Swift is effortless. She just thinks, oh, you know what? I'll have a fun little thing with my friends Heim, and we'll put some shirts on. And the next thing you know, it's probably a multimillion dollar business. And I'm phenomenal. Literally in the living room. With my wife going, I'm telling you, the crumple. If the. If you make a dog bed for dogs, you throw it down, it changes the topography every time. We call it the crumple sharks.
Gillian Spear
I'm offering you 10%.
Brittany Mamedovic
It's gonna happen.
Jon Stewart
Who wants to get on the floor with me and make some money?
Brittany Mamedovic
It's effortless for her. It's crazy.
Jon Stewart
It's ridiculous. It is effortless. Did you guys watch the. The. How did you experience the festivities of the New York Knickerbockers?
Gillian Spear
I just watched at home and then
Jon Stewart
actually, like, did the streets explode outside your apartment?
Brittany Mamedovic
Yes.
Gillian Spear
So that's what I did. I like when I was getting a little optimistic near the end, so I actually put. I put my TV on mute, and I opened up the windows so I could just hear the reaction you felt.
Jon Stewart
That's what I wanted to do, is feel the city.
Gillian Spear
Yeah. And then after. After it ended, I went out on the street and I took my dog on a walk, and we got to see everybody celebrating and stuff. It was great.
Brittany Mamedovic
That's so awesome.
Jon Stewart
How did your dog handle? I was gonna say, I was like, that sounds like a great story.
Gillian Spear
Except he's like, we're walking towards the loud noises. I don't. I don't know why.
Jon Stewart
Roman candles. My favorite.
Gillian Spear
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
Brittany, did you. Did you pop outside as well?
Brittany Mamedovic
I stayed awake this time.
Jon Stewart
Nice.
Brittany Mamedovic
And we did. I ran outside when there was, like, five minutes left. There's, like, a pizza place near me that had, like, screen set up. And it was wild. But the best part was the TV was on delay, so we kept just refreshing our phone to see. And so we saw that they had won, and we were like, they won. And then it was awesome. And then, like, fireworks. So cool.
Jon Stewart
Just a wonderful night.
Brittany Mamedovic
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
You know, Smigel was the one who. I was saying, you know where you're going to watch. You thinking about maybe Madison Square Garden or something like that in the house? He goes, I. I gotta tell you, I want to feel the city. And it sounded so like. And I was like, yes, feel the city. That's what we want. And so that's. That's what we did. We went down.
Brittany Mamedovic
You were in the streets.
Gillian Spear
Well, they showed you on the broadcast.
Jon Stewart
Yeah. That wasn't cool. That was. Yeah, that was bad. I was, like, standing out there. I just looked up for a second. I was like, oh, I don't know.
Gillian Spear
You were the spider man meme.
Jon Stewart
I don't know what's happening right now.
Brittany Mamedovic
Hey, feel the city. Would Be a good T shirt, John.
Jon Stewart
Feel the city.
Gillian Spear
I like that.
Brittany Mamedovic
Yeah, get on it.
Jon Stewart
You know what else? What if the feel the city shirt doubled as a crumple and you make it and you throw it on the floor. Brittany, what do the people want to know this week?
Brittany Mamedovic
All right, first up, John, after 250 years, is it fitting or disturbing that Trump is president?
Jon Stewart
Oh, God. It fitting or wait, what fitting? It's not fitting. This is, it's. Trump as president is not befitting of a country. We just talked about this grand experiment of exceptionalism, of a creed that a people must strive morally and aspirationally to get to. And now we're just a subsidiary of Trump Enterprises. He can't be the guy at the 250. It's such the wrong. You know what it reminds me of? We're like a long running show, like a Broadway show.
Gillian Spear
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
We're like, it's 250 years of cats, but now instead of like the, the big stars that were there, now it's just like from Summer House. That's what, that's where we're at. We're at the replacement level reality TV star taking over a hallowed institution.
Gillian Spear
And the audience is on their phones.
Jon Stewart
And the audience is on their phones going like. I remember when I saw this with Matthew Broderick. It was great. It was, was great. And now this guy doesn't even know how to sing.
Brittany Mamedovic
Ticket sales down the toilet.
Jon Stewart
Yeah, no, done.
Brittany Mamedovic
Okay, next, Next. John, are you gonna replace the Knicks picture above your door with a picture of the 2016?
Jon Stewart
I would, you know what? I, I, I would love a companion.
Gillian Spear
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
To that.
Gillian Spear
You have the space. Looking at it now.
Jon Stewart
Yeah, I love that picture so much because that is, that's, I, it's when I fell in love with that team, you know, Willis Reed and the magical coming out after, you know, hurting his leg and hitting two quick jumpers, you know, to lead, you know, the Knicks to big. I mean he went out of the game after that, but he sort of inspired the team. And Bradley and debusher were just these unbelievable, they were the great like corner, you know, Bradley from the corner just popping them. And Walt Frazier was a magician and Dickie Barnett and just those were the teams that I fell in love with. And then they ended up adding Earl the Pearl and winning again in, in 73. But that team just represents like I just loved the city so much and I love that. And that team just felt so representative because it wasn't also like back then, it was Wilt Chamberlain and like, you know, the Celtics, dynasties and all that shit. And my first ever game at the Garden was a double overtime playoff game. Nick Celtics. My brother and I went.
Gillian Spear
So cool.
Jon Stewart
Yeah, yeah. And. And Knicks were getting the Doors blown up. Funny, it's a very similar kind of game. They're getting the Doors blown off in the first half. And then Frazier just came alive and they tied the game, went into overtime. Double overtime. These were the JoJo White Celtics, Dave Collins and all those guys. Havalchek, I think, who wasn't playing. But yeah, just. It. Just the best. And. And in the heart of the city, you know, just. It's just such a special. There's none of the, like, mad Meadlands. There's none of the, like. Where. Oh, they're the New York Knicks, but they play in a swamp somewhere near exit 16W. Like, it's. It was in the city. You could take the subway there. You could walk outside and feel this. It. It's that thing Smaggle was saying, felt the city. Whenever you went to the Garden, you felt the city just fantastic.
Brittany Mamedovic
Were you courtside for that game as well? Oh, yeah.
Jon Stewart
No, they put me right. I was. I was right next to the stars of the day. Yeah. I'm not even sure. I mean, I think I might have gotten altitude sickness at that game.
Gillian Spear
Like, the rafters are real.
Jon Stewart
Like, rafters are real, baby.
Gillian Spear
See up there? Yeah, yeah.
Jon Stewart
But. But they are, as they say about the rafters, they are real and they are spectacular.
Gillian Spear
Yes.
Brittany Mamedovic
All right, we gotta get you a picture to go up there.
Jon Stewart
Yep, yep. What else we got?
Brittany Mamedovic
Final question in the trilogy of Taco Bell questions.
Gillian Spear
Oh, my God. The people want to know.
Brittany Mamedovic
They really do. Chipotle or Taco Bell?
Jon Stewart
Oh, please. How is this even a question? Chipotle. Hey, you want me to just scoop it out of a bucket for you? Hey. Hey. Come on in here. What do you want a bucket of chicken or you want a bucket of beef? Or maybe I could give you a bucket of black bean mush that we decided to add whatever ridiculous ghost pepper spice they put in there. Like.
Gillian Spear
Brutal.
Jon Stewart
It's brutal. Yeah, I don't. I don't like to eat out of buckets. I like to see some work. I like some origami. I want to see. I want to know that a craftsman, that an artist. Now, to be fair, they probably do use buckets. I just don't see that part. The real mistake of Chipotle is putting the buckets. You see it? You're walking right down the street with them. You're like, you want out of this bucket or you want to edit this book? Let me get my ice cream scoop. And you're watching them also do the, like, portion training.
Brittany Mamedovic
Yeah.
Jon Stewart
Where they're like, give me the half scoop in the thing. Let me get him the thing of rice. And then, like, you know, there's, there's a lot of manipulation that goes on. I like to, I don't want to see the work. I want to see once the piece of paper becomes a swan. That's all I want. I want to see the swan. I don't want to see the folding.
Gillian Spear
I definitely don't want to see the folding. Yeah.
Jon Stewart
Fantastic. How they get in touch with us, Brittany.
Brittany Mamedovic
Twitter. We are weekly showpad. Instagram threads TikTok Blue Sky. We are weekly show podcast and you can, like subscribe and comment on our YouTube channel. The weekly show with Jon Stewart.
Jon Stewart
Boom. Do it. Thanks again as always. Producer Brittany Mamedovic, producer Gillian Spear, video editor and engineer Rob Vitola has work cut out for him today. Audio editor and engineer Nicole Boyce had her work cut out for today. And our executive producers Chris McShane and Katie Gray, thanks so much and we'll see you next week. The weekly show with Jon Stewart is a Comedy Central podcast. It's produced by Paramount Audio and Busboy Productions.
Annette Gordon-Reed
Paramount podcasts.
Episode: America 250: History vs. Mythology
Air Date: June 17, 2026
Guests:
In this episode commemorating America’s upcoming 250th anniversary, Jon Stewart is joined by esteemed historians Annette Gordon-Reed and David Blight. Together, they examine the complex and contested territory of American history—probing the tension between fact, mythology, and politics as the U.S. prepares to celebrate its semi-quincentennial. The conversation tackles the current culture war over history, the rise of originalist and nationalist narratives, the stakes of “controlling” history, and the enduring power—and peril—of America’s founding creeds.
[07:26] Stewart kicks off by highlighting two rival official commemorations: America 250 (Congressional, bipartisan) and Freedom 250 (Trump administration-founded, nationalist), asking what their existence signals.
[09:11] Stewart asks why controlling origin stories is so important.
[16:01] Stewart: “If they can control the narrative of the past, they can control the future?”
[21:39] Stewart asks why diverse stories are seen as “degrading” rather than remarkable.
[38:09] Stewart draws a parallel between America’s empathy for white working-class economic loss and its usual resistance to similar stories from Black Americans.
David Blight:
Annette Gordon-Reed:
Jon Stewart:
The episode serves as an urgent, accessible masterclass in American historical memory, both celebrating and interrogating the nation’s ideals on the eve of its 250th birthday. Stewart, Gordon-Reed, and Blight make a case for embracing complexity, resisting authoritarian attempts to “own” history, and reaffirming the value of aspirational, inclusive creeds. While acknowledging the damage already done in the political and educational sphere, they remain cautiously hopeful that public engagement and factual pluralism will ultimately prevail over propaganda and nostalgia.
For full context and more in-depth exchanges, consult the specific timestamps above.